Package: spamassassin
Version: 3.1.0a-2
Hello Duncan,
I retried with 3.1.0a-2, and this time I deleted the bayesian database
and rebuilt it from my spam/ham maiboxes. The results are better but
there still the problem of sa-learn --spam having no effect on the
rating of some spam, whereas the sa
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 10:01:35AM -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 02:42:03PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > Hello Duncan,
> > Since I have upgraded to 3.1.0a-1, bayesian filtering is far less
> > efficient than with the sarge version or 3.0.4.
> >
> > Symptoms are a ton o
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 02:42:03PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Hello Duncan,
> Since I have upgraded to 3.1.0a-1, bayesian filtering is far less
> efficient than with the sarge version or 3.0.4.
>
> Symptoms are a ton of spam with BAYES_50, sa-learn not increasing
> the bayesian probability mos
Package: spamassassin
Version: 3.1.0a-1
Severity: normal
Hello Duncan,
Since I have upgraded to 3.1.0a-1, bayesian filtering is far less
efficient than with the sarge version or 3.0.4.
Symptoms are a ton of spam with BAYES_50, sa-learn not increasing
the bayesian probability most of the time (but
4 matches
Mail list logo