Bug#334534: Patch from bug 307724 breaks Eclipse

2005-12-20 Thread Loïc Minier
Hi, On Mon, Dec 19, 2005, Douglas Pollock wrote: > I suppose the philosophies are just different between Eclipse and Debian, > which makes it hard for me to understand your position. In Eclipse this > would be viewed as a regression. If we have a patch that fixes some bug and > causes

Bug#334534: Patch from bug 307724 breaks Eclipse

2005-12-17 Thread Loic Minier
reopen 334534 forwarded 334534 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=324336 thanks Hi, On Sat, Dec 17, 2005, Loic Minier wrote: > All I can offer is that we work with upstream to get some "extra > version" information in the API so that distros can include some > package related in

Bug#334534: Patch from bug 307724 breaks Eclipse

2005-12-17 Thread Loic Minier
Hi, On Fri, Dec 16, 2005, Billy Biggs wrote: > I talked about this again with seb128 at UBZ. I really think the > right solution is for Debian to revert the change. It's a really > low-level X thing, and there is no good way for us to detect that it is > fixed. Changing the Eclipse co

Bug#334534: Patch from bug 307724 breaks Eclipse

2005-12-16 Thread Billy Biggs
Loic Minier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > On Fri, Dec 16, 2005, Douglas Pollock wrote: > > I would appreciate it if you could re-open this bug. Eclipse > > continues to get bugs filed about this issue (e.g., > > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=119622). It means > > that one of the first q

Bug#334534: Patch from bug 307724 breaks Eclipse

2005-12-16 Thread Loic Minier
Hi, On Fri, Dec 16, 2005, Douglas Pollock wrote: > I would appreciate it if you could re-open this bug. Eclipse continues to > get > bugs filed about this issue (e.g., > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=119622). It means that one of > the first questions we must ask when

Bug#334534: Patch from bug 307724 breaks Eclipse

2005-10-18 Thread Billy Biggs
Loic Minier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Updating stable for something as large as Gtk isn't trivial, and only > happens for really important fixes which are visibly correct. > Updating to a higher version is not an option for Debian, but > updating the patch to match the actual fix implemented upst

Bug#334534: Patch from bug 307724 breaks Eclipse

2005-10-18 Thread Loic Minier
Hi, On Tue, Oct 18, 2005, Billy Biggs wrote: > I think the patch should be removed, or stable should be updated to > GTK+ 2.6.8. Patching back a very tricky and low-level X event handling > patch into a previous version just decreases the stability of the > toolkit. Updating stable fo

Bug#334534: Patch from bug 307724 breaks Eclipse

2005-10-18 Thread Billy Biggs
Package: gtk+2.0 Severity: important The fix for Debian bug 307724 added a patch from gtk-2-6 branch to the 2.6.4 release for sarge. This causes the following bugs in Eclipse, where keybindings can completely fail: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=111479 https://bugs.eclip