Bug#335392: Building OpenOffice for AMD64

2005-12-18 Thread Emmanuel Fleury
Hi Rene, Rene Engelhard wrote: rhino isn't in the .orig.tar.gz That might explain. Anyway, I know how to fix this bug (have a patch for it) but fixing this bug for 2.0.0 is completely useless since it may build but not really work. That's why I don't put efforts into it. ok. If you

Bug#335392: Building OpenOffice for AMD64

2005-12-18 Thread Emmanuel Fleury
Hi, I still can't build the 2.0.0+2.0.1rc4-1, I have the following: = Building project rhino = /home/fleury/devel/projects/openoffice/openoffice.org-2.0.0+2.0.1rc4-1/ooo-build/build/src680-m145/rhino mkout -- version: 1.5 - dmake: Error --

Bug#335392: Building OpenOffice for AMD64

2005-12-18 Thread Rene Engelhard
Emmanuel Fleury wrote: No, I want a true 64-bit version of OOo and I'm here to help. This place is the wrong place. You want a stable true 64-bit version, right? OOo is still far away from being that... Is there plan, for Debian, to move quickly to the 2.0.1 ? A lot of Yes, ... people are

Bug#335392: Building OpenOffice for AMD64

2005-12-18 Thread Rene Engelhard
Emmanuel Fleury wrote: [...] dmake: Error -- `./rhino1_5R4.patch' not found, and can't be made '---* tg_merge.mk *---' [...] Yes. Look in the patchlist. It's obvious. Regards, Rene signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#335392: Building OpenOffice for AMD64

2005-12-17 Thread Emmanuel Fleury
Hi, I made some progress. Patch attached to this mail. As usually: 1) apt-get source openoffice.org 2) cd openoffice.org-2.0.0/ 3) patch -p1 ../compile-openoffice.patch 4) dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -us -uc Then I get the following error: = Building project rhino =

Bug#335392: Building OpenOffice for AMD64

2005-12-17 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Emmanuel Fleury wrote: As usually: 1) apt-get source openoffice.org 2) cd openoffice.org-2.0.0/ 3) patch -p1 ../compile-openoffice.patch 4) dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -us -uc Then I get the following error: = Building project rhino = rhino isn't in