On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 09:54:11PM +0100, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
On gio, 24 nov 2005, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
I mailed you guys now because I think that by that time, it is no longer
possible to consider doing anything for etch, and that changes like
discontinuing a branch of
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 09:57:00AM +0100, A Mennucc wrote:
Too many zope(s)? That was discussed already. Problem is: there are a
lot of differences between zope2.6, zope2.7 and zope2.8 : you cannot
simply upgrade and hope your portal will continue to work. Some time
ago I had a conversation
On gio, 24 nov 2005, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
I mailed you guys now because I think that by that time, it is no longer
possible to consider doing anything for etch, and that changes like
discontinuing a branch of software in Debian take time.
Anyway, thank you all for considering this,
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 12:40:23AM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 09:53:37PM +0100, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
On dom, 20 nov 2005, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
Why isn't the canonical zope version simply called 'zope' here? If I'd
remove zope, there will be no
Jeroen van Wolffelaar writes:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 09:53:37PM +0100, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
On dom, 20 nov 2005, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
Why isn't the canonical zope version simply called 'zope' here? If I'd
remove zope, there will be no 'zope' package anymore for people to
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 01:16:40AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
Jeroen van Wolffelaar writes:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 09:53:37PM +0100, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
On dom, 20 nov 2005, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
Why isn't the canonical zope version simply called 'zope' here? If I'd
6 matches
Mail list logo