On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 12:15:42PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
This bug should be able to be closed as fixed in version 0.79.
No, it shouldn't. This bug is known to be present in the Debian pam
0.79
package, which includes a patch from the Debian
Steve Langasek wrote:
This bug should be able to be closed as fixed in version 0.79.
No, it shouldn't. This bug is known to be present in the Debian pam 0.79
package, which includes a patch from the Debian selinux maintainers which
does indeed open this (relatively minor) security
This bug should be able to be closed as fixed in version 0.79.
Ref:
http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2005-2977
Thanks,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
* Julien Goodwin:
This bug should be able to be closed as fixed in version 0.79.
Ref:
http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2005-2977
This page doesn't mention version 0.79 at all. Why do you think it's
been fixed in our 0.79 version?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 12:23:35AM +1100, Julien Goodwin wrote:
This bug should be able to be closed as fixed in version 0.79.
No, it shouldn't. This bug is known to be present in the Debian pam 0.79
package, which includes a patch from the Debian selinux maintainers which
does indeed open this
On 27/02/2006 6:13 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Julien Goodwin:
This bug should be able to be closed as fixed in version 0.79.
Ref:
http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2005-2977
This page doesn't mention version 0.79 at all. Why do you think it's
been fixed in our 0.79 version?
From
On 27/02/2006 9:28 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 12:23:35AM +1100, Julien Goodwin wrote:
This bug should be able to be closed as fixed in version 0.79.
No, it shouldn't. This bug is known to be present in the Debian pam 0.79
package, which includes a patch from the
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 01:55:10PM +1100, Julien Goodwin wrote:
On 27/02/2006 9:28 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 12:23:35AM +1100, Julien Goodwin wrote:
This bug should be able to be closed as fixed in version 0.79.
No, it shouldn't. This bug is known to be present in
8 matches
Mail list logo