Bug#336344: (no subject)

2006-10-31 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 12:15:42PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Steve Langasek wrote: This bug should be able to be closed as fixed in version 0.79. No, it shouldn't. This bug is known to be present in the Debian pam 0.79 package, which includes a patch from the Debian

Bug#336344: (no subject)

2006-10-22 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Steve Langasek wrote: This bug should be able to be closed as fixed in version 0.79. No, it shouldn't. This bug is known to be present in the Debian pam 0.79 package, which includes a patch from the Debian selinux maintainers which does indeed open this (relatively minor) security

Bug#336344: (no subject)

2006-02-26 Thread Julien Goodwin
This bug should be able to be closed as fixed in version 0.79. Ref: http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2005-2977 Thanks, Julien signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#336344: (no subject)

2006-02-26 Thread Florian Weimer
* Julien Goodwin: This bug should be able to be closed as fixed in version 0.79. Ref: http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2005-2977 This page doesn't mention version 0.79 at all. Why do you think it's been fixed in our 0.79 version? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Bug#336344: (no subject)

2006-02-26 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 12:23:35AM +1100, Julien Goodwin wrote: This bug should be able to be closed as fixed in version 0.79. No, it shouldn't. This bug is known to be present in the Debian pam 0.79 package, which includes a patch from the Debian selinux maintainers which does indeed open this

Bug#336344: (no subject)

2006-02-26 Thread Julien Goodwin
On 27/02/2006 6:13 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: * Julien Goodwin: This bug should be able to be closed as fixed in version 0.79. Ref: http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2005-2977 This page doesn't mention version 0.79 at all. Why do you think it's been fixed in our 0.79 version? From

Bug#336344: (no subject)

2006-02-26 Thread Julien Goodwin
On 27/02/2006 9:28 AM, Steve Langasek wrote: On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 12:23:35AM +1100, Julien Goodwin wrote: This bug should be able to be closed as fixed in version 0.79. No, it shouldn't. This bug is known to be present in the Debian pam 0.79 package, which includes a patch from the

Bug#336344: (no subject)

2006-02-26 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 01:55:10PM +1100, Julien Goodwin wrote: On 27/02/2006 9:28 AM, Steve Langasek wrote: On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 12:23:35AM +1100, Julien Goodwin wrote: This bug should be able to be closed as fixed in version 0.79. No, it shouldn't. This bug is known to be present in