Bug#339364: [Vtun-devel] Question about old patch proposed

2007-10-18 Thread bishop
Oops. I'll update the page. Eugene Berdnikov wrote: Where is 3.01? Page http://vtun.sourceforge.net/download.html have only references for 3.0.0, that's why I did not submit this patch again. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#339364: [Vtun-devel] Question about old patch proposed

2007-10-18 Thread Eugene Berdnikov
Hi, MartМn. The fix for an UDP timeout handling bug is in a patch below. It was compiled with lzo1 and verified on Debian/testing. Version of VTUN was incremented to 3.0.2. In next mail I'll return to the discussion and answer questions. -- Eugene Berdnikov

Bug#339364: [Vtun-devel] Question about old patch proposed

2007-10-18 Thread Eugene B. Berdnikov
Hi, MartМn. On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 01:25:15PM -0300, MartМn Ferrari wrote: Thank you for this reference. As a Debian maintainer you can update URL in the vtun package description block, and I ask you to do that. The homepage in the description is correct. Only that the download

Bug#339364: [Vtun-devel] Question about old patch proposed

2007-10-17 Thread bishop
Hi Martin, That patch looks pretty mangled and the (apparent) Artifact ID it references doesn't look valid. Is the problem still occurring? But I think you're asking the same question, and I've never seen such a problem in my own set-up; not that I've recognized to be the bug so reported.

Bug#339364: [Vtun-devel] Question about old patch proposed

2007-10-17 Thread Martín Ferrari
Hi Bishop, On 10/17/07, bishop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That patch looks pretty mangled and the (apparent) Artifact ID it references doesn't look valid. Is the problem still occurring? But I think you're asking the same question, and I've never seen such a problem in my own set-up; not

Bug#339364: [Vtun-devel] Question about old patch proposed

2007-10-17 Thread Eugene Berdnikov
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 01:05:11AM -0700, bishop wrote: That patch looks pretty mangled and the (apparent) Artifact ID it references doesn't look valid. ... I've recognized to be the bug so reported. I'll put it on my queue, but I can't say when I'd be able to generate a set of patches from

Bug#339364: [Vtun-devel] Question about old patch proposed

2007-10-17 Thread Martín Ferrari
On 10/17/07, Eugene Berdnikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 01:05:11AM -0700, bishop wrote: That patch looks pretty mangled and the (apparent) Artifact ID it references doesn't look valid. ... I've recognized to be the bug so reported. I'll put it on my queue, but I

Bug#339364: [Vtun-devel] Question about old patch proposed

2007-10-17 Thread Eugene Berdnikov
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 10:57:19AM -0300, MartМn Ferrari wrote: On 10/17/07, Eugene Berdnikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Where is 3.01? Page http://vtun.sourceforge.net/download.html have only references for 3.0.0, that's why I did not submit this patch again. That's outdated, use

Bug#339364: [Vtun-devel] Question about old patch proposed

2007-10-17 Thread Martín Ferrari
Eugene, On 10/17/07, Eugene Berdnikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's outdated, use http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=2947 Thank you for this reference. As a Debian maintainer you can update URL in the vtun package description block, and I ask you to do that. The