Bug#339661: patch

2006-02-10 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 02:26:41AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.02.10.0213 +0100]: I don't understand what you mean. I tried subscribing to a bug with different From envelope and From: header lines, and lists.debian.org replied to the

Bug#339661: patch

2006-02-10 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.02.10.1216 +0100]: You could always try again to double check... echo From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | sendmail -f [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... the mail arrived @debian.org. So it seems you are right. I think my previous confusion may have

Bug#339661: patch

2006-02-09 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.02.09.0009 +0100]: Have checked: the BTS/lists.d.o pays attention to the From: line and ignores the Envelope-From, so we can just use plain old sendmail and not worry about munging anything. This did not work for me. -- .''`. martin f.

Bug#339661: patch

2006-02-09 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 09:18:14AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.02.09.0009 +0100]: Have checked: the BTS/lists.d.o pays attention to the From: line and ignores the Envelope-From, so we can just use plain old sendmail and not worry about

Bug#339661: patch

2006-02-09 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.02.09.1944 +0100]: This did not work for me. Really? What exactly did you do? It worked for me. Let's see what happens then. :) -- .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' :proud Debian developer and author:

Bug#339661: patch

2006-02-09 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.02.10.0213 +0100]: I don't understand what you mean. I tried subscribing to a bug with different From envelope and From: header lines, and lists.debian.org replied to the From: header line, not the envelope-from address. Okay; I did the same

Bug#339661: patch

2006-02-09 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 11:13:02PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.02.09.1944 +0100]: This did not work for me. Really? What exactly did you do? It worked for me. Let's see what happens then. :) I don't understand what you mean. I tried

Bug#339661: patch

2006-02-08 Thread martin f krafft
tags 339661 + patch thanks Here's the patch. Note, I am not a perl dude. I did test the functionality, but you never know. However, it integrates well, the un/subscribe commands can be used together with others (separate mails will be sent), but I don't vouch for it. Have fun, diff -Nru

Bug#339661: patch

2006-02-08 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.02.08.2037 +0100]: I don't understand why you've introduced this $btsserver variable in all of the initial variables. If we want the bts script to be usuable on other servers, we could do that, but then we'd need to introduce a command-line

Bug#339661: patch

2006-02-08 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 02:41:28PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: tags 339661 + patch thanks Here's the patch. Note, I am not a perl dude. I did test the functionality, but you never know. However, it integrates well, the un/subscribe commands can be used together with others (separate

Bug#339661: patch

2006-02-08 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 08:50:26PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.02.08.2037 +0100]: I don't understand why you've introduced this $btsserver variable in all of the initial variables. If we want the bts script to be usuable on other servers,

Bug#339661: patch

2006-02-08 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 08:50:26PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: Also, many users won't be able to run /usr/sbin/sendmail -f, so that's not helpful. If the subscription system can't handle faked From: lines, then we're stuffed. Yeah. I just found a better means! [EMAIL PROTECTED]