On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 02:26:41AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.02.10.0213 +0100]:
I don't understand what you mean. I tried subscribing to a bug with
different From envelope and From: header lines, and lists.debian.org
replied to the
also sprach Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.02.10.1216 +0100]:
You could always try again to double check...
echo From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | sendmail -f [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
... the mail arrived @debian.org. So it seems you are right. I think
my previous confusion may have
also sprach Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.02.09.0009 +0100]:
Have checked: the BTS/lists.d.o pays attention to the From: line and
ignores the Envelope-From, so we can just use plain old sendmail and
not worry about munging anything.
This did not work for me.
--
.''`. martin f.
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 09:18:14AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.02.09.0009 +0100]:
Have checked: the BTS/lists.d.o pays attention to the From: line and
ignores the Envelope-From, so we can just use plain old sendmail and
not worry about
also sprach Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.02.09.1944 +0100]:
This did not work for me.
Really? What exactly did you do? It worked for me.
Let's see what happens then. :)
--
.''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :' :proud Debian developer and author:
also sprach Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.02.10.0213 +0100]:
I don't understand what you mean. I tried subscribing to a bug with
different From envelope and From: header lines, and lists.debian.org
replied to the From: header line, not the envelope-from address.
Okay; I did the same
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 11:13:02PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.02.09.1944 +0100]:
This did not work for me.
Really? What exactly did you do? It worked for me.
Let's see what happens then. :)
I don't understand what you mean. I tried
tags 339661 + patch
thanks
Here's the patch. Note, I am not a perl dude. I did test the
functionality, but you never know. However, it integrates well, the
un/subscribe commands can be used together with others (separate
mails will be sent), but I don't vouch for it.
Have fun,
diff -Nru
also sprach Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.02.08.2037 +0100]:
I don't understand why you've introduced this $btsserver variable in
all of the initial variables. If we want the bts script to be usuable
on other servers, we could do that, but then we'd need to introduce a
command-line
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 02:41:28PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
tags 339661 + patch
thanks
Here's the patch. Note, I am not a perl dude. I did test the
functionality, but you never know. However, it integrates well, the
un/subscribe commands can be used together with others (separate
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 08:50:26PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.02.08.2037 +0100]:
I don't understand why you've introduced this $btsserver variable in
all of the initial variables. If we want the bts script to be usuable
on other servers,
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 08:50:26PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
Also, many users won't be able to run /usr/sbin/sendmail -f, so that's
not helpful. If the subscription system can't handle faked From:
lines, then we're stuffed.
Yeah. I just found a better means!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
12 matches
Mail list logo