On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 01:34:23PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 02:41:49AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Sorry, I have to disagree with these bug severities; Suggests: are just not
> > important enough in our packaging system to treat them as release-critical,
> > regar
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 01:57:17PM +0100, Adeodato Sim?? wrote:
> * Robert Millan [Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:34:23 +0100]:
>
> > Well, that's not the problem. If the application needs unrar to extract rar
> > archives, then suggesting unrar is ok [1]. It's the fact that the
> > application
> > suppor
* Robert Millan [Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:34:23 +0100]:
> Well, that's not the problem. If the application needs unrar to extract rar
> archives, then suggesting unrar is ok [1]. It's the fact that the application
> supports creating rar archives that I believe violates the DFSG.
> Does this explana
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 02:41:49AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> Sorry, I have to disagree with these bug severities; Suggests: are just not
> important enough in our packaging system to treat them as release-critical,
> regardless of what's being suggested,
Hi Steve,
My concern is about the
severity 340704 important
severity 340705 important
severity 340706 important
severity 340707 important
thanks
Hi Robert,
Sorry, I have to disagree with these bug severities; Suggests: are just not
important enough in our packaging system to treat them as release-critical,
regardless of what's be
Package: ark
Severity: serious
Justification: DFSG #4
This package has a "Suggests: rar" tag. If it has the functionality to create
rar archives via rar, this is a serious problem, because it is encouraging users
to create "trap archives" that can't be extracted with free software. I believe
thi
6 matches
Mail list logo