Bug#341163: electricsheep: Several packaging issues
Le lundi 28 novembre 2005 à 21:26 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : * It is wrong to include the whole GPL in debian/copyright because it wastes disk space. Please truncate it to the amount used in the source files and refer to the copy of the GPL: | On Debian GNU/Linux systems, the complete text of the GNU General | Public License can be found in `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL'. I didn't include the whole GPL (this debian/copyright file was made by the previous maintainer). Here is the content: --- $ cat electricsheep-2.6.3/debian/copyright This package was initialy debianized by Sander Smeenk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Then Alexis Sukrieh [EMAIL PROTECTED] adopted it. It was downloaded from http://electricsheep.org/ Upstream Author: Scott Draves [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copyright: This package is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public Licensers published by the Free Software Foundation; version 2 dated June, 1991. This package is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with this package; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA. On Debian GNU/Linux systems, the complete text of the GNU General Public License can be found in `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL'. --- Are you meaning I should remove the first paragraphs? Regards, -- Alexis Sukrieh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#341163: electricsheep: Several packaging issues
Alexis Sukrieh wrote: I didn't include the whole GPL (this debian/copyright file was made by the previous maintainer). I confused `debian/REJECT' and `debian/copyright', sorry. The former did indeed contain the whole GPL. Kind regards, Philipp Kern -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#341163: electricsheep: Several packaging issues
tags 341163 + pending thanks I made a new package which solves all the issues reported here. I'm going to upload it to dak.ganneff.de soon... Regards. -- Alexis Sukrieh [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#341163: electricsheep: Several packaging issues
Package: electricsheep Version: 2.6.3-1 Severity: normal Hi Alexis, this package has several packaging issues which are outlined below. The problems are taken verbatim from the soon-to-come TS part 2 reply. Please fix them as soon as possible. * Why is there a debian/REJECT in the diff, containing debian/copyright? * It is wrong to include the whole GPL in debian/copyright because it wastes disk space. Please truncate it to the amount used in the source files and refer to the copy of the GPL: | On Debian GNU/Linux systems, the complete text of the GNU General | Public License can be found in `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL'. * You should convert your package away from xlibs-dev to a more narrow set of libraries, to include just those needed. * You include `debian/default-files/electricsheep.desktop' and `debian/electricsheep.desktop': needless duplication. * In `prerm' there are remainings of `install-info', please use `dh_installinfo' instead when you need it. It will take care of all that. * Your maintainer scripts are all stubs, you could easily cut them down to a tiny version which just contains the shebang, `set -e' and `#DEBHELPER#'. But this is not required. * `debian/rules' looks ok. Kind regards, Philipp Kern Debian Developer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
