On Sun, 31 Dec 2006, Kevin Brown wrote:
maximilian attems wrote:
have you tried newer than 2.6.18, is there a patch upstream for that
in 2.6.20-rc2 ?
if yes we are happy to integrate the fix.
a quick scan of the git log drivers/net/skge.c doesnt show anything
convincing, so please
maximilian attems wrote:
is that bug still existent in 2.6.18 linux-image ?
I don't know; I replaced the VIA board with an nForce board...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 30 Dec 2006, Kevin Brown wrote:
snipp
The bug that prevents the skge interface from coming up when in upper
memory remapping mode is still present in 2.6.18.
--
Kevin Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
have you tried newer than 2.6.18, is there a
maximilian attems wrote:
have you tried newer than 2.6.18, is there a patch upstream for that
in 2.6.20-rc2 ?
if yes we are happy to integrate the fix.
a quick scan of the git log drivers/net/skge.c doesnt show anything
convincing, so please report upstream in bugzilla.kernel.org
once you
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006, Kevin Brown wrote:
Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
Ok, I've tested and it definitely seems that
linux-image-2.6.15-1-amd64-k8 version 2.6.15-7 is not affected by the
network/SATA hang (bug #347412)
I haven't tested 2.6.15-7 SMP, but all the previous 2.6.15-X SMP
maximilian attems wrote:
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006, Kevin Brown wrote:
Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
Ok, I've tested and it definitely seems that
linux-image-2.6.15-1-amd64-k8 version 2.6.15-7 is not affected by the
network/SATA hang (bug #347412)
I haven't tested 2.6.15-7 SMP, but all
Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
Ok, I've tested and it definitely seems that
linux-image-2.6.15-1-amd64-k8 version 2.6.15-7 is not affected by the
network/SATA hang (bug #347412)
I haven't tested 2.6.15-7 SMP, but all the previous 2.6.15-X SMP
versions were affected, so...
[This is a dual-core
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 05:48:17AM -0800, Kevin Brown wrote:
Hmm...2.6.16 is out now, so perhaps that works properly in SMP mode?
Nope, already tested :-(
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kevin Brown wrote:
Could you test with the amd64-generic kernel to see if you get hangs
with the on-board Promise controller and ethernet? I was considering
putting another couple of disks in mine but don't want to spend the
cash if it'll just hang.
Well, I'm testing with the -k8 kernel,
Ok, I've tested and it definitely seems that
linux-image-2.6.15-1-amd64-k8 version 2.6.15-7 is not affected by the
network/SATA hang (bug #347412)
I haven't tested 2.6.15-7 SMP, but all the previous 2.6.15-X SMP
versions were affected, so...
[This is a dual-core athlon 4400, so it'd be nice to
Kevin Brown wrote:
Well, the main reason is that I didn't see any advantage, since I'm
running a non-SMP system.
Ok, so you don't see the ethernet/sata hangs, then? Are you using the
VIA SATA controller or the Promise one?
One other thing: I'm using ECC memory, and have ECC enabled.
Why
Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
Kevin Brown wrote:
Well, the main reason is that I didn't see any advantage, since I'm
running a non-SMP system.
Ok, so you don't see the ethernet/sata hangs, then? Are you using the
VIA SATA controller or the Promise one?
Just the VIA SATA controller for now.
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 01:15:26AM -0800, Kevin Brown wrote:
Just the VIA SATA controller for now. I have a system with an A8V
(non-Deluxe version) that doesn't have the on-board Promise
controller. I put a SATA 150 TX4 in it, and I'm using two ports on
that and the two on-board VIA SATA
Kevin Brown wrote:
PS: Since you have the same hardware as me, I'm curious if you're able
to use kernels 2.6.12.
Yeah. I'm currently using 2.6.15. Note that I'm using the
amd64-generic kernel, not the amd64-k8 kernel. I don't expect that
makes any difference at all with respect to this
Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
Kevin Brown wrote:
PS: Since you have the same hardware as me, I'm curious if you're able
to use kernels 2.6.12.
Yeah. I'm currently using 2.6.15. Note that I'm using the
amd64-generic kernel, not the amd64-k8 kernel. I don't expect that
makes any
Kevin Brown wrote:
I can confirm this bug.
I'm running kernel 2.6.15-1-amd64-generic version 2.6.15-6, and see
the very same thing.
So I have to turn off the memory remapping feature that allows the
system to see all 4 gig of memory, and thus lose the use of about 200
megabytes of
Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
Kevin Brown wrote:
I can confirm this bug.
I'm running kernel 2.6.15-1-amd64-generic version 2.6.15-6, and see
the very same thing.
So I have to turn off the memory remapping feature that allows the
system to see all 4 gig of memory, and thus lose the use
I can confirm this bug.
I'm running kernel 2.6.15-1-amd64-generic version 2.6.15-6, and see
the very same thing.
So I have to turn off the memory remapping feature that allows the
system to see all 4 gig of memory, and thus lose the use of about 200
megabytes of memory.
Hardware: ASUS A8V
18 matches
Mail list logo
