On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 05:51:16PM +0100, Stephen Kell wrote:
Is there any reason why Jan's suggested changes haven't been made? I too
would be very happy to see them applied.
Lameness of the maintainer. (Oops, that's me)
I'm currently testing this.
Cheers,
Michael
--
Is there any reason why Jan's suggested changes haven't been made? I too
would be very happy to see them applied.
Stephen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Erwan David wrote:
Yasd that would make easier for me to explain that eclipse is a
windows only thing
If you choose to make yoursellf dependant on people who claim that
microsoft waéy is the only way to use a computer,be logical and make
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 11:55:15AM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Erwan David wrote:
Yasd that would make easier for me to explain that eclipse is a
windows only thing
If you choose to make yoursellf dependant on people who claim that
Le Sat 17/12/2005, Arnaud Vandyck disait
1° This is not a bug for me, Eclipse runs fine on Debian... and with
free software;
For me the software is not really free if it is a prison for the user.
Gnome is a bunch of ill-designed software whose only goal is to do as windows
do. It is just what
Hi You,
Michael Koch wrote:
If there is a constructive patch which is not too hard to maintain and
is not too intrusive to change Eclipse' behavior drastically I will
apply it for sure.
AFAIK, there is a easy patch to debian/rules: Just change one debhelper
call to add the dependencies of
Le Fri 16/12/2005, Michael Koch disait
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 09:32:11AM +0100, Erwan David wrote:
Le Wed 14/12/2005, Michael Koch disait
I would like that you check the facts before writing such words.
You are free not to use the Eclipse packaged by Debian but e.g. the Help
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 09:19:43AM +0100, Erwan David wrote:
Le Fri 16/12/2005, Michael Koch disait
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 09:32:11AM +0100, Erwan David wrote:
Le Wed 14/12/2005, Michael Koch disait
I would like that you check the facts before writing such words.
You are
OK. I've had enough of this, please.
And do you think I'm not fed upo witrh people wanting to impose gnome
to me ?
Since the technical side of the bug report has been excessively dealt with,
I suggest closing it as not a bug, since we have an Eclipse developer's
confirmation.
Yes
On 16-Dec-05, at 3:19 AM, Erwan David wrote:
No eclipse (the software) depends on *gtk* libs. Even eclipse.org does
not cite gnome as a requirements. *YOU* impose gnome.
Erwan, what part about my description of our use of GNOME is
confusing?
We use GNOME-VFS to implement the Program API.
Le Fri 16/12/2005, Billy Biggs disait
On 16-Dec-05, at 3:19 AM, Erwan David wrote:
No eclipse (the software) depends on *gtk* libs. Even eclipse.org does
not cite gnome as a requirements. *YOU* impose gnome.
Erwan, what part about my description of our use of GNOME is
confusing?
We
Hi,
I don't want to add to the confusion, so I just reply to you. Feel to
forward if you think my email is constructive enough to be considered ;-)
On 16-Dec-05, at 3:19 AM, Erwan David wrote:
We use GNOME-VFS to implement the Program API. It's used to:
- determine what your system
Le Wed 14/12/2005, Billy Biggs disait
It needs Mozilla for the embedded browser, as it uses the Gecko
embedding API. Erwan is correct that if this is not available, the
help system will launch in an external web browser. However, this is
a degredation of functionality. We would like
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 09:32:11AM +0100, Erwan David wrote:
Le Wed 14/12/2005, Michael Koch disait
I would like that you check the facts before writing such words.
You are free not to use the Eclipse packaged by Debian but e.g. the Help
system which is a vital system for some users
Le Wed 14/12/2005, Michael Koch disait
I would like that you check the facts before writing such words.
You are free not to use the Eclipse packaged by Debian but e.g. the Help
system which is a vital system for some users will not work. Other
thinks don't work either. Upstream Eclipse
Hi everyone.
[Erwan, this mail is for the eclipse maintainers. I've kept you cc'ed
to keep you in the discussion.]
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 19:32, Erwan David wrote:
And that doies not explain th gnome dependency, which is heavier, and
tottaly inadequate and, I repeat DANGEROUS.
I have an
On 14-Dec-05, at 3:32 AM, Erwan David wrote:
I would like that you check the facts before writing such words.
You are free not to use the Eclipse packaged by Debian but e.g.
the Help
system which is a vital system for some users will not work. Other
thinks don't work either. Upstream
Andrew, you don't need to go to such incredible feats of
sleuthing. :)
I am an SWT developer and I think I already explained quite clearly in
this bug report what dependencies are there and what are needed.
I have an eclipse.org binary release (3.1.1) unpacked in ~/bin/
eclipse on my
sarge
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 11:36:29PM +0100, Erwan David wrote:
Le Sat 10/12/2005, Michael Koch disait
I agree with you, Stephan. Tagging it 'wontfix' is the best thing. Or
just close it. We can either try to ship an Eclipse that works out of
the box or a an Eclipse that needs much help from
Hi
I'm a debian user, not a debian developer, but I feel the need to chime in
here.
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 09:36, Erwan David wrote:
So you want to oblige people to use the pile of crap that gnome is. MY
freedom is also to NOT use software I think is ill designed and is a
danger.
So don't use
On 12/7/05, Erwan David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: eclipse
Severity: normal
sudo apt-get -u install eclipse
Password:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
dbus-1 dbus-glib-1 eclipse-jdt eclipse-jdt-common
Le Sat 10/12/2005, Stephan Michels disait
On 12/7/05, Erwan David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: eclipse
Severity: normal
sudo apt-get -u install eclipse
Password:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
On 10-Dec-05, at 8:53 AM, Erwan David wrote:
The gnome libraries are needed for SWT, for example
org.eclipse.swt.program.Program to get informations about the mine
type and icons etc. for a given file.
False, eclipse and swt work perfectly without gnome.
Hi Erwan, I'm an SWT developer.
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 02:42:41PM +0100, Stephan Michels wrote:
On 12/7/05, Erwan David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: eclipse
Severity: normal
sudo apt-get -u install eclipse
Password:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
The following extra packages
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 02:53:13PM +0100, Erwan David wrote:
Le Sat 10/12/2005, Stephan Michels disait
On 12/7/05, Erwan David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: eclipse
Severity: normal
sudo apt-get -u install eclipse
Password:
Reading package lists... Done
Building
Le Sat 10/12/2005, Michael Koch disait
I agree with you, Stephan. Tagging it 'wontfix' is the best thing. Or
just close it. We can either try to ship an Eclipse that works out of
the box or a an Eclipse that needs much help from the admin to install
additional stuff that Eclipse not depends
Package: eclipse
Severity: normal
sudo apt-get -u install eclipse
Password:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
dbus-1 dbus-glib-1 eclipse-jdt eclipse-jdt-common eclipse-pde
eclipse-pde-common eclipse-platform
27 matches
Mail list logo
