Bug#342650: pike7.6: The pike package is present in sarge but missing from etch.
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 02:33:57PM +0100, Edward Welbourne scribbled: I note with glee, upon my return from mid-winter holidays, that the pike package set now shows up among etch's New Packages (as reported by aptitude) - bug fixed, thank you :-) :) I hope to upload pike 7.7 to experimental soon, if you're interested happy new year :), marek signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#342650: pike7.6: The pike package is present in sarge but missing from etch.
I note with glee, upon my return from mid-winter holidays, that the pike package set now shows up among etch's New Packages (as reported by aptitude) - bug fixed, thank you :-) Eddy. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342650: pike7.6: The pike package is present in sarge but missing from etch.
Hello Edward, You're right, I misread your initial message and thus the confusion. You're right, pike7.6 is not in etch yet - please see http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?excuse=pike7.6 though. It should be in the testing archive really soon now. thanks for your input, regards marek
Bug#342650: pike7.6: The pike package is present in sarge but missing from etch.
Hello Marek, You're right, I misread your initial message heh - I deal with bug reports too - misreading is all too easy. It's an unavoidable problem of knowing enough to usually be right ... please see http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?excuse=pike7.6 though. I like the url; it has a pleasing honesty to it ^^ It should be in the testing archive really soon now. Yay :-) Not that it'll affect me until it's updated to a newer version than sarge offered me the other week, since I *do* have it installed, but other users of testing will be better for it :-) Eddy. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342650: pike7.6: The pike package is present in sarge but missing from etch.
Thanks for your prompt reply. http://packages.debian.org/unstable/interpreters/pike7.6 http://www.debian.org/releases/ says that unstable is sid, testing is etch. See bug summary: the problem is with etch. On http://packages.debian.org/testing/interpreters/ I see the alphabetical list go php5-uuid (1.3.1-1) OSSP uuid module for php5 prolog-el (1.3-3) Emacs major mode for editing Prolog code without the intervening several pages of pike that show up on the matching page for unstable. If I try to access http://packages.debian.org/testing/interpreters/pike7.6 I get a 404 response. As you can see, the package is right there. in sarge and sid but *not in etch* ... Eddy. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342650: pike7.6: The pike package is present in sarge but missing from etch.
Package: pike7.6 Version: 7.6.24-1 Severity: important Some months ago I upgraded from sarge to etch by simply editing sources.list and running aptitude -u; consequently, I kept the pike7.6 from before the switch. (I'm told a dist-upgrade would have removed it.) This week, I got a new machine, so set it up straight off in testing. The pike7.6 package is not present. I had to add a sarge entry back into sources.list to retrieve it ! So it's *etch*, not pike, that was rendered unusable (for me) by this omission ... -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-11-em64t-p4-smp Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages pike7.6 depends on: ii pike7.6-core 7.6.24-1 Powerful interpreted programming l ii pike7.6-gdbm 7.6.24-1 Gdbm module for Pike ii pike7.6-image 7.6.24-1 Image module for Pike Versions of packages pike7.6 recommends: ii pike7.6-doc 7.6.24-1 Pike 7.6 documentation meta packag -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342650: pike7.6: The pike package is present in sarge but missing from etch.
severity 342650 normal thanks On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 11:35:28AM +0100, Edward Welbourne scribbled: Package: pike7.6 Version: 7.6.24-1 Severity: important Some months ago I upgraded from sarge to etch by simply editing sources.list and running aptitude -u; consequently, I kept the pike7.6 from before the switch. (I'm told a dist-upgrade would have removed it.) This week, I got a new machine, so set it up straight off in testing. The pike7.6 package is not present. I had to add a sarge entry back into sources.list to retrieve it ! So it's *etch*, not pike, that was rendered unusable (for me) by this omission ... I must say you got me surprised with that, because: - http://packages.debian.org/unstable/interpreters/pike7.6 http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6_7.6.55-1_all.deb # apt-cache show pike7.6 Package: pike7.6 Priority: optional Section: interpreters Installed-Size: 36 Maintainer: Marek Habersack [EMAIL PROTECTED] Architecture: all Version: 7.6.55-1 Depends: pike7.6-core (= 7.6.55-1), pike7.6-image (= 7.6.55-1), pike7.6-gdbm (= 7.6.55-1) Recommends: pike7.6-doc (= 7.6.55-1) Suggests: pike7.6-mysql (= 7.6.55-1), pike7.6-pg (= 7.6.55-1), pike7.6-dev (= 7.6.55-1) Filename: pool/main/p/pike7.6/pike7.6_7.6.55-1_all.deb Size: 18248 MD5sum: 1c2d0ddfc332b493a49064c1a548d3b2 Description: Recommended meta package for Pike 7.6 - As you can see, the package is right there. Perhaps it's a problem with your mirror? Could you please try using some other mirror just to see whether the problem disappears? Meanwhile I'm changing the severity of the bug to normal. Please let me know about the results of your tests with the new mirror, regards, marek signature.asc Description: Digital signature
