Bug#343666: cdrecord: segfaults on burn start

2005-12-19 Thread dann frazier
On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 01:52 +, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 06:40:40PM -0700, dann frazier wrote: > >On Sat, 2005-12-17 at 12:48 +, Steve McIntyre wrote: > >> On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 05:40:09PM -0700, dann frazier wrote: > >> >Package: cdrecord > >> >Version: 4:2.01+01a03

Bug#343666: cdrecord: segfaults on burn start

2005-12-19 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 06:40:40PM -0700, dann frazier wrote: >On Sat, 2005-12-17 at 12:48 +, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 05:40:09PM -0700, dann frazier wrote: >> >Package: cdrecord >> >Version: 4:2.01+01a03-4 >> >Severity: important >> > >> >A backtrace is below[1]. The 4

Bug#343666: cdrecord: segfaults on burn start

2005-12-19 Thread dann frazier
On Sat, 2005-12-17 at 12:48 +, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 05:40:09PM -0700, dann frazier wrote: > >Package: cdrecord > >Version: 4:2.01+01a03-4 > >Severity: important > > > >A backtrace is below[1]. The 4:2.01+01a03-4 release didn't segv, but > >reported > >an error[2]. >

Bug#343666: cdrecord: segfaults on burn start

2005-12-17 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 05:40:09PM -0700, dann frazier wrote: >Package: cdrecord >Version: 4:2.01+01a03-4 >Severity: important > >A backtrace is below[1]. The 4:2.01+01a03-4 release didn't segv, but reported >an error[2]. Bugger. I _think_ I've found the problem, some debug left in that was a lit

Bug#343666: cdrecord: segfaults on burn start

2005-12-16 Thread dann frazier
Package: cdrecord Version: 4:2.01+01a03-4 Severity: important A backtrace is below[1]. The 4:2.01+01a03-4 release didn't segv, but reported an error[2]. [1] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ sudo gdb /usr/bin/cdrecord.mmap GNU gdb 6.3.90_20051119-debian Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is