Bug#344538: hppa dependency problems on build of pdns

2006-01-11 Thread Matthijs Mohlmann
Steve Langasek wrote: On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 02:37:53PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: Matthijs Mohlmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't know where to send this else, so forgive me if this is the wrong mailinglist. See:

Bug#344538: hppa dependency problems on build of pdns

2006-01-10 Thread Frank Küster
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 02:37:53PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: The same happened to the planner package, and has been reported as #344538. It seems that hppa buildd is broken, don't know yet whether the buildd admin (Lamont) or anybody of the

Bug#344538: hppa dependency problems on build of pdns

2006-01-10 Thread LaMont Jones
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 11:08:14AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: or a bug in some maintainer script or other; How a bug in a maintainer script could have the result that installing an arch-all package fails because an other arch-all package is not

Bug#344538: hppa dependency problems on build of pdns

2006-01-10 Thread Frank Küster
LaMont Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 11:08:14AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: or a bug in some maintainer script or other; How a bug in a maintainer script could have the result that installing an arch-all package fails because

Bug#344538: hppa dependency problems on build of pdns

2006-01-09 Thread Frank Küster
Matthijs Mohlmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I don't know where to send this else, so forgive me if this is the wrong mailinglist. See: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=pdnsver=2.9.19-2arch=hppastamp=1135294848file=logas=raw [..] [...] As you can see, tetex-base depends on

Bug#344538: hppa dependency problems on build of pdns

2006-01-09 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 02:37:53PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: Matthijs Mohlmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't know where to send this else, so forgive me if this is the wrong mailinglist. See: