On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 02:02:22AM +0200, Luigi Gangitano wrote:
It seems that in the dump you sent many packages are truncated and
cannot be reconstructed.
I have no idea why you think that -- it was taken with -s 5000, and the MTU
of my network interface is 1500...
/* Steinar */
--
Il giorno 27/lug/06, alle ore 14:47, Steinar H. Gunderson ha scritto:
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 02:02:22AM +0200, Luigi Gangitano wrote:
It seems that in the dump you sent many packages are truncated and
cannot be reconstructed.
I have no idea why you think that -- it was taken with -s 5000,
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 05:27:46PM +0200, Luigi Gangitano wrote:
Upstream could not use your dump and asked for another dump with
increased snaplen.
Hm, that's odd. Oh well, I'll probably get to it sometime near the beginning
of next week.
In any case, the dump should be rather irrelevant --
Hi Steinar,
It seems that in the dump you sent many packages are truncated and
cannot be reconstructed.
Can you please provide a dump with a larger snaplen (64KB should be
enough)?
In the meanwhile you can track progress of this bug on the upstream
bug tracking application at
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 03:30:44PM +0200, Luigi Gangitano wrote:
Hi Steinar,
I forwarded this bug to the upstream developers, who asked for more
informations:
A somewhat odd server sending back the response before the entire
request have
been sent..
Ah, yes. I've looked around a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Steinar,
I forwarded this bug to the upstream developers, who asked for more
informations:
A somewhat odd server sending back the response before the entire
request have
been sent..
Please collect etheral traces of the traffic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
forward 345552 http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1652
thanks
Hi Steinar,
sorry for the late reply. I just forwarded this bug to the upstream
bugzilla database.
Regards,
- --
Luigi Gangitano -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL
Package: squid
Version: 2.5.12-1
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
Hi,
My image gallery supports WebDAV upload, and since the rest of the
gallery goes via Squid (as a web accelerator), so does the DAV. However,
directory listings give me an odd problem. Note the following packet
dump (captured
8 matches
Mail list logo