On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 08:25:46AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 05:43:47PM -0800, obi wrote:
radeonfb: Retreived PLL infos from BIOS
radeonfb: Reference=27.00 MHz (RefDiv=12) Memory=252.00 Mhz, System=200.00
MHz
and this is what rovclock -i ells
Reference
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 12:15:45AM -0800, obi wrote:
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 08:25:46AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 05:43:47PM -0800, obi wrote:
radeonfb: Retreived PLL infos from BIOS
radeonfb: Reference=27.00 MHz (RefDiv=12) Memory=252.00 Mhz,
System=200.00 MHz
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 10:12:12AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 12:15:45AM -0800, obi wrote:
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 08:25:46AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 05:43:47PM -0800, obi wrote:
radeonfb: Retreived PLL infos from BIOS
radeonfb:
Package: linux-source-2.6.15
Version: 2.6.15-1
Severity: minor
Hello,
I have a radeon M9 in my thinkpad T41 and both rovclock (radeon
overclock) and fglrx (when I tried it) reported that the memory speed is
200 MHz and core speed is 252 MHz, while in radeonfb during boot reports
the opposite
tags 346345 moreinfo
stop
On Fri, 06 Jan 2006, graziano wrote:
Hello,
I have a radeon M9 in my thinkpad T41 and both rovclock (radeon
overclock) and fglrx (when I tried it) reported that the memory speed is
200 MHz and core speed is 252 MHz, while in radeonfb during boot reports
the
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 11:46:48AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
tags 346345 moreinfo
stop
On Fri, 06 Jan 2006, graziano wrote:
Hello,
I have a radeon M9 in my thinkpad T41 and both rovclock (radeon
overclock) and fglrx (when I tried it) reported that the memory speed is
200
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 05:43:47PM -0800, obi wrote:
radeonfb: Retreived PLL infos from BIOS
radeonfb: Reference=27.00 MHz (RefDiv=12) Memory=252.00 Mhz, System=200.00 MHz
and this is what rovclock -i ells
Reference clock from BIOS: 27.0 MHz
XTAL: 27.0 MHz, RefDiv: 6
Core: 252.0 MHz,
7 matches
Mail list logo
