Bug#349279: tailor: _process.py seems under non-GPL license

2006-01-25 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 08:06:35AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: > I don't see how those messages give you the impression that this license > is not GPL-compatible. The license is in fact a BSD license, sans > advertising clause, and is thus GPL-compatible. Yes, this is 3 clause BSD variant =

Bug#349279: tailor: _process.py seems under non-GPL license

2006-01-23 Thread Josh Triplett
Osamu Aoki wrote: > Thanks for saving lost soul. > > On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 12:58:28AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: >>This clause is universally interpreted to mean that the permission is >>granted and you don't need to pay a fee to get that permission; in other >>words, "for any purpose and witho

Bug#349279: tailor: _process.py seems under non-GPL license

2006-01-22 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, Thanks for saving lost soul. On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 12:58:28AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: > This clause is universally interpreted to mean that the permission is > granted and you don't need to pay a fee to get that permission; in other > words, "for any purpose and without fee is granted"

Bug#349279: tailor: _process.py seems under non-GPL license

2006-01-22 Thread Josh Triplett
Osamu Aoki wrote: > On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 04:52:23PM -0800, Walter Landry wrote: >>Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>This license only gives permission when fee is not charged. That seems >>>to be DSFG1 violation. Also mixing code of GPL and this seems to be >>>incompatible. >> >>This i

Bug#349279: tailor: _process.py seems under non-GPL license

2006-01-21 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 04:52:23PM -0800, Walter Landry wrote: > Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Although /usr/share/doc/tailor/copyright states GPL for tailor package, > > this is not GPL for sure. --> problem. > > This is a problem, though not all that serious. The copyright info

Bug#349279: tailor: _process.py seems under non-GPL license

2006-01-21 Thread Walter Landry
Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Although /usr/share/doc/tailor/copyright states GPL for tailor package, > this is not GPL for sure. --> problem. This is a problem, though not all that serious. The copyright info must be correct. > This license only gives permission when fee is not charge

Bug#349279: tailor: _process.py seems under non-GPL license

2006-01-21 Thread Osamu Aoki
Package: tailor Version: 0.9.19-2 Severity: important Justification: DFSG 1 violation etc. by including _process.py Please do not panic, it is easy to fix. :-) Proposed fix: (in /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/vcpx) * remove _process.py which cause useless license concern * possibly eliminate