Bug#350235: pcmciautils ?

2006-01-29 Thread di dit
Hi, I've had exactly the same problem when I started playing with pcmciautils a few days ago. The latest version of pcmcia-cs (3.2.8-6) depends on pcmciautils, so I'm afraid this package might have triggered the problem in the original report too. (But it also solved an issue I had with my

Bug#350235: pcmciautils ?

2006-01-29 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Jan 29, di dit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have no idea if this can help or not fixing the bug. udevinfo -a -p /block/hde/hde1 returns nothing interesting in the first case. I still need the data. Below is the OOPS I got, in case it might help. Some messages were You should open a kernel

Bug#350235: pcmciautils ?

2006-01-29 Thread di dit
2006/1/29, Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Jan 29, di dit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have no idea if this can help or not fixing the bug. udevinfo -a -p /block/hde/hde1 returns nothing interesting in the first case. I still need the data. Here it is. In the first case (when the CPU

Bug#350235: pcmciautils ?

2006-01-29 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Jan 29, di dit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can see why the rule does not work, at the removable==1 level we have BUS==block instead of the expected BUS==ide, and DRIVER is only available at the upper level. Kay? BUS==ide, SYSFS{removable}==1, DRIVER!=ide-cdrom, GOTO=no_volume_id Maybe a rule

Bug#350235: pcmciautils ?

2006-01-29 Thread di dit
Hi, 2006/1/29, Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED]: BUS==ide, SYSFS{removable}==1, DRIVER!=ide-cdrom, GOTO=no_volume_id Maybe a rule like this one would work, but is it correct? (And how are people going to figure this?) BUS==ide, SYSFS{block/removable}==1, DRIVER!=ide-cdrom, GOTO=no_volume_id

Bug#350235: pcmciautils ?

2006-01-29 Thread Kay Sievers
On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 12:07:50PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: On Jan 29, di dit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can see why the rule does not work, at the removable==1 level we have BUS==block instead of the expected BUS==ide, and DRIVER is only available at the upper level. Kay? Correct, that

Bug#350235: pcmciautils ?

2006-01-29 Thread Kay Sievers
On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 12:07:50PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: On Jan 29, di dit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can see why the rule does not work, at the removable==1 level we have BUS==block instead of the expected BUS==ide, and DRIVER is only available at the upper level. Kay? BUS==ide,

Bug#350235: pcmciautils ?

2006-01-29 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 12:07:50PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: Maybe a rule like this one would work, but is it correct? (And how are people going to figure this?) BUS==ide, SYSFS{block/removable}==1, DRIVER!=ide-cdrom, GOTO=no_volume_id I'll test this in the next hour or two and let you