Hi,
I've had exactly the same problem when I started playing with
pcmciautils a few days ago. The latest version of pcmcia-cs (3.2.8-6)
depends on pcmciautils, so I'm afraid this package might have
triggered the problem in the original report too. (But it also solved
an issue I had with my
On Jan 29, di dit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have no idea if this can help or not fixing the bug. udevinfo -a -p
/block/hde/hde1 returns nothing interesting in the first case.
I still need the data.
Below is the OOPS I got, in case it might help. Some messages were
You should open a kernel
2006/1/29, Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Jan 29, di dit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have no idea if this can help or not fixing the bug. udevinfo -a -p
/block/hde/hde1 returns nothing interesting in the first case.
I still need the data.
Here it is. In the first case (when the CPU
On Jan 29, di dit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can see why the rule does not work, at the removable==1 level we have
BUS==block instead of the expected BUS==ide, and DRIVER is only
available at the upper level.
Kay?
BUS==ide, SYSFS{removable}==1, DRIVER!=ide-cdrom, GOTO=no_volume_id
Maybe a rule
Hi,
2006/1/29, Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
BUS==ide, SYSFS{removable}==1, DRIVER!=ide-cdrom, GOTO=no_volume_id
Maybe a rule like this one would work, but is it correct? (And how are
people going to figure this?)
BUS==ide, SYSFS{block/removable}==1, DRIVER!=ide-cdrom,
GOTO=no_volume_id
On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 12:07:50PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Jan 29, di dit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can see why the rule does not work, at the removable==1 level we have
BUS==block instead of the expected BUS==ide, and DRIVER is only
available at the upper level.
Kay?
Correct, that
On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 12:07:50PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Jan 29, di dit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can see why the rule does not work, at the removable==1 level we have
BUS==block instead of the expected BUS==ide, and DRIVER is only
available at the upper level.
Kay?
BUS==ide,
On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 12:07:50PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
Maybe a rule like this one would work, but is it correct? (And how are
people going to figure this?)
BUS==ide, SYSFS{block/removable}==1, DRIVER!=ide-cdrom,
GOTO=no_volume_id
I'll test this in the next hour or two and let you
8 matches
Mail list logo