Bug#350598: Segfault in samba

2006-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
severity 350598 important forwarded 350598 https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3383 merge 350598 346069 thanks On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 06:27:56PM -0500, Ambrose Li wrote: On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 09:44:47PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: Do you have any mor einformation about what is

Bug#350598: Segfault in samba

2006-01-31 Thread Ambrose Li
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 06:48:32AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: security = server is a bad idea security-wise, and is weakly supported upstream. I highly recommend moving to domain-based security instead. Thanks for the hint. I used security = server only because I had used security = domain

Bug#350598: Segfault in samba

2006-01-30 Thread Ambrose Li
Package: samba Version: 3.0.21a-4 Severity: normal I got about a couple of dozens of emails about segfault in samba and was asked to report it here. According to apt-get dist-upgrade, my system (unstable) should be up-to-date. I have installed the samba-dbg package as instructed, but the stack

Bug#350598: Segfault in samba

2006-01-30 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Ambrose Li ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Package: samba Version: 3.0.21a-4 Severity: normal I got about a couple of dozens of emails about segfault in samba and was asked to report it here. Do you have any mor einformation about what is exactly done on the server when the crash happens?

Bug#350598: Segfault in samba

2006-01-30 Thread Ambrose Li
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 09:44:47PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: Do you have any mor einformation about what is exactly done on the server when the crash happens? Does this happens when clients are doing some action and, if so, which action? I am not sure. It just started a few days ago,