On 31 January 2006 at 21:54, Greg Kochanski wrote:
| Sorry. Lost my temper for a moment.
No apologies needed. I tend to be fairly kurt with bug reports, but I do this
as a volunteer so nobody pays me to hold your hand either.
| Yes, it was a user error. What makes you believe that
|
Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 31 January 2006 at 21:52, Greg Kochanski wrote:
| The thing I enjoy most about interacting with R developers
| is their grasp of the obvious.
|
| As I said, R incorrectly handled a user error.
|
|
| I get the feeling (correct me if I'm wrong) that users of R
| are
On 31 January 2006 at 21:52, Greg Kochanski wrote:
| The thing I enjoy most about interacting with R developers
| is their grasp of the obvious.
|
| As I said, R incorrectly handled a user error.
|
|
| I get the feeling (correct me if I'm wrong) that users of R
| are assumed to be perfect?
|
Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 31 January 2006 at 21:54, Greg Kochanski wrote:
| Sorry. Lost my temper for a moment.
No apologies needed. I tend to be fairly kurt with bug reports, but I do this
as a volunteer so nobody pays me to hold your hand either.
| Yes, it was a user error. What makes
On 1 February 2006 at 00:33, Greg Kochanski wrote:
| Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| On 31 January 2006 at 21:54, Greg Kochanski wrote:
| | Sorry. Lost my temper for a moment.
|
| No apologies needed. I tend to be fairly kurt with bug reports, but I do
this
| as a volunteer so nobody pays me
Package: r-base
Version: 2.2.1-2
Severity: normal
This bug can be considered to be
(1) incorrect handling of a user error, or
(2) incorrect documentation, or
(3) missing Debian documentation.
(Depending on one's mood, I suppose.)
Running download.packages(vcd) leads to
(a) a warning that it is
6 matches
Mail list logo
