Michael Kerrisk wrote:
Michael Kerrisk, le Wed 05 Apr 2006 23:13:29 +0200, a écrit :
From an upstream point of view, I don't want to make these
changes at this time. The reason is that the w* pages in
question do not yet exist. I have added text to the
HOWTOHELP document noting
Umh... it would be better to add a note to the manpages in question
about their *w* counterparts, or even document the *w* variant within
the non-*w* variant with a proper note.
Ooops -- I misread that. My preference would be separate pages,
just for consistency with existing practice for the
Ok. But couldn't str version still point to the undocumented man
page?
(for letting the programmer as soon as now that these functions
exist).
This is not how things are done (upstream at least).
Umh... it would be better to add a note to the manpages in question
about their
reopen 351996
thanks
Hi,
It seems like my previous mail went unnoticed, here it is again:
Samuel Thibault, le Thu 23 Feb 2006 12:14:45 +0100, a écrit :
I noticed the new manpages 2.24 package that adds a lot of
references. However there are a few missing bits. Grepping equivalent
man3/*w*
Von: Samuel Thibault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It seems like my previous mail went unnoticed, here it is again:
Samuel Thibault, le Thu 23 Feb 2006 12:14:45 +0100, a écrit :
I noticed the new manpages 2.24 package that adds a lot of
references. However there are a few missing bits. Grepping
Michael Kerrisk, le Wed 05 Apr 2006 23:13:29 +0200, a écrit :
From an upstream point of view, I don't want to make these
changes at this time. The reason is that the w* pages in
question do not yet exist. I have added text to the
HOWTOHELP document noting that these pages are yet to
be
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 11:32:18PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Michael Kerrisk, le Wed 05 Apr 2006 23:13:29 +0200, a ?crit :
From an upstream point of view, I don't want to make these
changes at this time. The reason is that the w* pages in
question do not yet exist. I have added text
Michael Kerrisk, le Wed 05 Apr 2006 23:13:29 +0200, a écrit :
From an upstream point of view, I don't want to make these
changes at this time. The reason is that the w* pages in
question do not yet exist. I have added text to the
HOWTOHELP document noting that these pages are yet to
tags 351996 - fixed-upstream
retitle manpages-dev: string functions should reference wide string equivalents
thanks
Hi,
I noticed the new manpages 2.24 package that adds a lot of
references. However there are a few missing bits. Grepping equivalent
man3/*w* missed the wide string functions that
Hi,
Michael Kerrisk, le Thu 09 Feb 2006 02:42:34 +0100, a écrit :
It might be useful that toupper() and such fonctions reference their
wide equivalents towupper() and such.
By and such, do you mean anything other than toupper()?
I mean all that have wchar_t* equivalents in
Michael Kerrisk, le Thu 09 Feb 2006 02:42:34 +0100, a écrit :
It might be useful that toupper() and such fonctions reference their
wide equivalents towupper() and such.
By and such, do you mean anything other than toupper()?
I mean all that have wchar_t* equivalents in
Michael Kerrisk, le Thu 09 Feb 2006 02:42:34 +0100, a écrit :
It might be useful that toupper() and such fonctions reference
their
wide equivalents towupper() and such.
By and such, do you mean anything other than toupper()?
I mean all that have wchar_t* equivalents in
tags 351996 fixed-upstream
thanks
Michael Kerrisk, le Thu 09 Feb 2006 02:42:34 +0100, a écrit :
It might be useful that toupper() and such fonctions reference their
wide equivalents towupper() and such.
By and such, do you mean anything other than toupper()?
I mean all that have
Package: manpages-dev
Version: 2.17-1
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
It might be useful that toupper() and such fonctions reference their
wide equivalents towupper() and such.
Regards,
Samuel
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (900,
It might be useful that toupper() and such fonctions reference their
wide equivalents towupper() and such.
Samuel,
By and such, do you mean anything other than toupper()?
Cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Kerrisk
maintainer of Linux man pages Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7
Want to help with man
15 matches
Mail list logo
