Now I built r-cran-rodbc 1.1.5 on my stable box - it works also on the
unstable box. This again shows that the problem is in the build
environment. However, I don't know how to further investigate this. Any
suggestions?
Please be patient. I need to take a look at the r-cran-rodbc and
reassign 354723 r-cran-rodbc
tags 354723 patch
thanks
Back to you, Dirk. :) Explanation below.
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 07:16:14PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 2 March 2006 at 14:22, Steve Langasek wrote:
| On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 11:10:56PM +0100, Johannes Ranke wrote:
| | So with
* Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060304 11:20]:
reassign 354723 r-cran-rodbc
tags 354723 patch
thanks
Well, thanks to you!
The patch is attached. I have confirmed that this patch fixes the problem
with returning rows on amd64.
I can second this, the patch fixes the problem - I am
* Johannes Ranke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060302 23:10]:
I just built r-cran-rodbc 1.1.3 on my unstable box - the problem is
back! If I reinstall the version from stable, it goes away again (and so
on:)
Hi again,
Now I built r-cran-rodbc 1.1.5 on my stable box - it works also on the
unstable box.
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 03:50:32PM +0100, Johannes Ranke wrote:
* Johannes Ranke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060302 23:10]:
I just built r-cran-rodbc 1.1.3 on my unstable box - the problem is
back! If I reinstall the version from stable, it goes away again (and so
on:)
Hi again,
Now I built
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 12:27:40PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 03:50:32PM +0100, Johannes Ranke wrote:
* Johannes Ranke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060302 23:10]:
I just built r-cran-rodbc 1.1.3 on my unstable box - the problem is
back! If I reinstall the version from
| So with RODBC the only variable here, I'm still pretty sure it's an RODBC
| bug.
I just built r-cran-rodbc 1.1.3 on my unstable box - the problem is
back! If I reinstall the version from stable, it goes away again (and so
on:)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 11:10:56PM +0100, Johannes Ranke wrote:
| So with RODBC the only variable here, I'm still pretty sure it's an RODBC
| bug.
I just built r-cran-rodbc 1.1.3 on my unstable box - the problem is
back! If I reinstall the version from stable, it goes away again (and so
I just built r-cran-rodbc 1.1.3 on my unstable box - the problem is
back! If I reinstall the version from stable, it goes away again (and so
on:)
Hah, ok, you beat me to it. :)
Alright, I'll try to take a look at what could be different between unixodbc
2.2.4 and unixodbc 2.2.11 that
Alright, I'll try to take a look at what could be different between unixodbc
2.2.4 and unixodbc 2.2.11 that would be triggering this. I have an amd64
system I can test on, so hopefully the problem will be reproducible.
and don't forget to reassign to unixodbc :):) Dirk will be happy...
reassign 354723 unixodbc
thanks
On 2 March 2006 at 14:22, Steve Langasek wrote:
| On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 11:10:56PM +0100, Johannes Ranke wrote:
| | So with RODBC the only variable here, I'm still pretty sure it's an
RODBC
| | bug.
|
| I just built r-cran-rodbc 1.1.3 on my unstable box -
11 matches
Mail list logo
