Bug#359044: Developers summary page only showing a fraction of his packages

2007-01-20 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Marcus Better 2007-01-12 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 This broke again. Please compare
   http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 The first shows 88 packages, the second only one.
 
 Perhaps the fix to #370454 broke it? Shouldn't e-mail addresses be case 
 insensitive?

Fwiw, this is a non-bug. What was actually broken was that the BTS
lower-cased the submitter address of #337828 but that is fixed now
(both in the wnpp bug and the BTS code).

Since this pops up so frequently I'll leave the report open as a
reminder to finally make ddpo use the carnivore data. That will make
both addresses show up.

Christoph
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#359044: Developers summary page only showing a fraction of his packages

2007-01-12 Thread Marcus Better
reopen 359044
thanks

This broke again. Please compare
  http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

The first shows 88 packages, the second only one.

Perhaps the fix to #370454 broke it? Shouldn't e-mail addresses be case 
insensitive?

Marcus


pgpsl5XugRJGb.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#359044: Developers summary page only showing a fraction of his packages

2007-01-12 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 10:13 +0100, Marcus Better wrote:
[...]
 Shouldn't e-mail addresses be case insensitive?

Since you asked ;-) - no, at least for local parts (i.e. the portion
preceding the @). In fact, they MUST NOT (in the BCP14 meaning of that
phrase) be. From RFC2821:

   Verbs and argument values (e.g., TO: or to: in the RCPT command
   and extension name keywords) are not case sensitive, with the sole
   exception in this specification of a mailbox local-part (SMTP
   Extensions may explicitly specify case-sensitive elements).  That is,
   a command verb, an argument value other than a mailbox local-part,
   and free form text MAY be encoded in upper case, lower case, or any
   mixture of upper and lower case with no impact on its meaning.  This
   is NOT true of a mailbox local-part.  The local-part of a mailbox
   MUST BE treated as case sensitive.  Therefore, SMTP implementations
   MUST take care to preserve the case of mailbox local-parts.  Mailbox
   domains are not case sensitive.  In particular, for some hosts the
   user smith is different from the user Smith.  However, exploiting
   the case sensitivity of mailbox local-parts impedes interoperability
   and is discouraged.

What the likelihood is of two maintainer addresses actually being
differently-cased versions of the same local part, on the other hand...

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#359044: Developers summary page only showing a fraction of his packages

2006-03-26 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen

Package: qa.debian.org
Version n/a; 2006-03-26

The summary page for Wolfgang Baer,
URL:http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED], only show
one package at the moment.  It shows tomcat4, while he is an uploader
or maintainer of a lot more packages, for example the source packages
buoy and commons-daemon.  Why are so few of his packages showing up on
his summary page?

Is there a bug in the developer page system?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]