Jorg, I want to clear up a few things in this bug report:
1. It's completely pointless Debian enabling -Wextra in the packaging
when the number of false positives is so incredibly large.
2. Discriminating between false positives and real bugs needs someone to
go through the entire codebase,
Hello Neil,
Neil Williams schrieb am Tue 15. Aug, 19:36 (+0100):
Jörg Sommer wrote:
Neil Williams schrieb am Mon 14. Aug, 14:38 (+0100):
Jörg Sommer wrote:
Hello Neil,
2. -Wextra is *not supported* by gnucash and errors are to be expected.
Don't use it.
-Wextra does not generate any
Jörg Sommer wrote:
Neil Williams schrieb am Mon 14. Aug, 14:38 (+0100):
Jörg Sommer wrote:
Hello Neil,
2. -Wextra is *not supported* by gnucash and errors are to be expected.
Don't use it.
-Wextra does not generate any errors. It warns about common cases where
errors can araise.
-Wextra
Jörg Sommer wrote:
Hello Neil,
2. -Wextra is *not supported* by gnucash and errors are to be expected.
Don't use it.
-Wextra does not generate any errors. It warns about common cases where
errors can araise.
That doesn't change the fact that upstream does not support it.
:-)
-Wextra DOES
Hello Neil,
Neil Williams schrieb am Mon 14. Aug, 14:38 (+0100):
Jörg Sommer wrote:
Hello Neil,
2. -Wextra is *not supported* by gnucash and errors are to be expected.
Don't use it.
-Wextra does not generate any errors. It warns about common cases where
errors can araise.
-Wextra
Jörg Sommer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Do you know why Thomas do not build with these libs? Are there any
problems?
It was not an intentional decision, and I plan to build with them on
the next upload.
Thomas
Hello Neil,
Neil Williams schrieb am Sat 12. Aug, 11:49 (+0100):
As such, you could rebuild with the goffice development libraries
installed and use the upstream code (which is more recent than the code
included in gnucash). GnuCash will automatically detect
libgoffice-1-dev and libgsf-1-dev
Hello Neil,
Neil Williams schrieb am Sat 12. Aug, 11:49 (+0100):
Hi Jorg:
Note: If the errors you report are in files prefixed with go- or in the
lib/goffice* or lib/libgsf* directories, these are *not* gnucash errors,
they are upstream GOffice issues. As such, you could rebuild with the
Jörg Sommer wrote:
Neil Williams schrieb am Sat 12. Aug, 11:49 (+0100):
GnuCash will
automatically detect libgoffice-1-dev and libgsf-1-dev installations and
use the associated libraries instead of building the code in
lib/goffice* and lib/libgsf*.
Is this valid for libqof-dev, true? I've
Hello Neil,
Neil Williams schrieb am Sun 13. Aug, 22:56 (+0100):
Jörg Sommer wrote:
I see now you mentioned originally:
compiling gnucash with -Wall and -Wextra brings some warnings like this:
So, here's a new start for this bug:
1. -Wall is already set, don't set it again.
OK, but this
Hi Jorg:
Note: If the errors you report are in files prefixed with go- or in the
lib/goffice* or lib/libgsf* directories, these are *not* gnucash errors,
they are upstream GOffice issues. As such, you could rebuild with the
goffice development libraries installed and use the upstream code (which
Package: gnucash
Version: 1.9.3-1hbci1
Severity: normal
Hi,
compiling gnucash with -Wall and -Wextra brings some warnings like this:
go-gradient.c:67: warning: comparison of unsigned expression 0 is always false
They might come from the fact that a char is by default unsigned on
PowerPC. This
severity 360780 wishlist
thanks
Jörg Sommer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: gnucash
Version: 1.9.3-1hbci1
Severity: normal
What's that version?
compiling gnucash with -Wall and -Wextra brings some warnings like this:
go-gradient.c:67: warning: comparison of unsigned expression 0 is
Hello Thomas,
Thomas Bushnell BSG schrieb am Tue 04. Apr, 13:11 (-0700):
Jörg Sommer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: gnucash
Version: 1.9.3-1hbci1
Severity: normal
What's that version?
It's 1.9.3-1 rebuild with HBCI support.
compiling gnucash with -Wall and -Wextra brings some
Jörg Sommer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Are you interessted in a patch?
Yep, always.
15 matches
Mail list logo
