On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 14:50 +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
Hi!
On Sunday 09 April 2006 15:08, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
* Package name: zope-cachefu
Version : 1.0-beta
Upstream Author : Geoff Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://plone.org/products/cachefu
*
On Monday 10 April 2006 14:53, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 14:50 +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
Hi!
On Sunday 09 April 2006 15:08, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
* Package name: zope-cachefu
Version : 1.0-beta
Upstream Author : Geoff Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 15:31 +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
I took zope-cmf1.5 as a model, and each Zope products get shipped in a
different binary package. Should I restructure the package
differently?
CMF is different, because it is more generic than cachefu,
which is plone specific. I would
On Monday 10 April 2006 15:03, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
A version of the package is available for testing (and uploading by
a sponsor if no problems are found) at:
http://parking.ingeniweb.com/zope-cachefu/
Two minor problems:
* debian/control: instead of manually depend on
On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 17:47 +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
On Monday 10 April 2006 15:34, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 15:31 +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
I took zope-cmf1.5 as a model, and each Zope products get shipped
in a different binary package. Should I restructure
On Monday 10 April 2006 15:34, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 15:31 +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
I took zope-cmf1.5 as a model, and each Zope products get shipped
in a different binary package. Should I restructure the package
differently?
CMF is different, because it is
6 matches
Mail list logo
