On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 18:23 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
There is exactly one header file, and IMO packages should care enough
about their dependencies to not do silly things to get a single file
included.
It smells like a transitional measure, but I don't know for sure. I see
that it was
Daniel Silverstone wrote:
Some are aware and do:
#include lua.h and have -I/usr/include/lua50
If software using Lua's C API wants to be portable, it should use the
lua.h form and get the include path from pkg-config. That should be
the end of it. Should someone want to use such software on
Package: liblua50-dev
Version: 5.0.2-6
Severity: normal
$ dpkg -c /var/cache/apt/archives/liblua50-dev_5.0.2-6_i386.deb |grep -- '-'
lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2006-04-09 10:03:01 ./usr/lib/liblua50.so -
liblua50.so.5.0
lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2006-04-09 10:03:01
Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: liblua50-dev
Version: 5.0.2-6
Severity: normal
$ dpkg -c /var/cache/apt/archives/liblua50-dev_5.0.2-6_i386.deb |grep -- '-'
lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2006-04-09 10:03:01 ./usr/lib/liblua50.so -
liblua50.so.5.0
lrwxrwxrwx root/root
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 04:30:06PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: liblua50-dev
Version: 5.0.2-6
Severity: normal
$ dpkg -c /var/cache/apt/archives/liblua50-dev_5.0.2-6_i386.deb |grep --
'-'
lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2006-04-09
Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 04:30:06PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: liblua50-dev
Version: 5.0.2-6
Severity: normal
$ dpkg -c /var/cache/apt/archives/liblua50-dev_5.0.2-6_i386.deb |grep --
'-'
lrwxrwxrwx
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 05:54:03PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 04:30:06PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: liblua50-dev
Version: 5.0.2-6
Severity: normal
$ dpkg -c
Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 05:54:03PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Does grep -r follow symlinks? That sounds kind of dangerous.
It does, I just checked. I'm not sure why it's dangerous, xargs in
/tmp/ is dumb, and anywhere else you control and should be
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 06:23:00PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 05:54:03PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Does grep -r follow symlinks? That sounds kind of dangerous.
It does, I just checked. I'm not sure why it's dangerous,
9 matches
Mail list logo
