Bug#361767: xlibmesa-gl: Cannot create libGL.so.1.2: No such file

2006-04-11 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 00:09 -0500, Adam Porter wrote: On Tuesday 11 April 2006 00:06, Michel Dänzer wrote: On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 20:00 -0500, Adam Porter wrote: On Monday 10 April 2006 02:33, Michel Dänzer wrote: On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 00:57 -0500, Adam Porter wrote: Am I the only

Bug#361767: xlibmesa-gl: Cannot create libGL.so.1.2: No such file

2006-04-10 Thread Adam Porter
Package: xlibmesa-gl Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4 Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 While trying to upgrade xlibmesa-gl to 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6, I get this error: Preparing to replace xlibmesa-gl 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4 (using .../xlibmesa-gl_6.9.0.dfsg.1-6_i386.deb) ... Unpacking

Bug#361767: xlibmesa-gl: Cannot create libGL.so.1.2: No such file

2006-04-10 Thread Michel Dänzer
close 361767 merge 327641 361767 kthxbye On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 00:57 -0500, Adam Porter wrote: Am I the only one having this problem, or is it a bug in the package? Neither. :} This is a duplicate of http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=327641 and friends. -- Earthling Michel

Bug#361767: xlibmesa-gl: Cannot create libGL.so.1.2: No such file

2006-04-10 Thread Adam Porter
On Monday 10 April 2006 02:33, Michel Dänzer wrote: close 361767 merge 327641 361767 kthxbye On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 00:57 -0500, Adam Porter wrote: Am I the only one having this problem, or is it a bug in the package? Neither. :} This is a duplicate of

Bug#361767: xlibmesa-gl: Cannot create libGL.so.1.2: No such file

2006-04-10 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 20:00 -0500, Adam Porter wrote: On Monday 10 April 2006 02:33, Michel Dänzer wrote: On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 00:57 -0500, Adam Porter wrote: Am I the only one having this problem, or is it a bug in the package? Neither. :} This is a duplicate of

Bug#361767: xlibmesa-gl: Cannot create libGL.so.1.2: No such file

2006-04-10 Thread Adam Porter
On Tuesday 11 April 2006 00:06, Michel Dänzer wrote: On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 20:00 -0500, Adam Porter wrote: On Monday 10 April 2006 02:33, Michel Dänzer wrote: On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 00:57 -0500, Adam Porter wrote: Am I the only one having this problem, or is it a bug in the package?