tags 365531 pending thanks Quoting Andre Luis Lopes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Hello, > > I noticed that I not only updated the translation but also recoded my > local copy to UTF-8 (from ISO-8859-1) before updating the translation. > > I'm sending a copy of the fully translated file I have locally, already > fully updated and fully recoded to UTF-8. Myabe that's better for you guys > to use this file rather than to apply the patch enconded as UTF-8 to a > ISO-8859-1 encoded translation.
Yeah, would be much better. Except that you sent the D-I translation file, not the xorg one..:-) Anyway, I managed to use your patch. I just add to apply it then change the header mentioning the encoding. So no need to re-send the file. I've commited this updated file to the SVN. Actually, I do not recommend sending patches for PO files, in general. Most often you're risking that the developer has something that has moved from what you used as reference and then is unable to apply your patch. So, this is why I never send patches for po-debconf and po translations. That makes bigger bug reports, yes, but that seems way safer to me, especially with developers that are not very well used with PO files.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
