Horms wrote:
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 11:01:25PM -0600, Alan Robertson wrote:
Horms wrote:
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 03:24:48PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Package: heartbeat
Severity: serious
Heya,
Let's see what the FHS says:
No binaries should be located under /etc. [3.4]
Now,
Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2006-06-08T07:15:01, Alan Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately heartbeat (for fairly broken reasons IMHO) really
needs those files there.
Could we symlink 'em somewhere?
Yes, I think that is a good solution (short of rearanging the
resource paths
Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2006-06-08T08:21:38, Alan Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please fix it everywhere, if you don't mind.
Thanks Horms!!
Of course, special attention needs to be paid to upgrading to (and
possibly, back off from) a version with that change.
I'm pretty
On 2006-06-08T08:21:38, Alan Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please fix it everywhere, if you don't mind.
Thanks Horms!!
Of course, special attention needs to be paid to upgrading to (and
possibly, back off from) a version with that change.
I'm pretty sure that RPM handles that
On 2006-06-08T07:15:01, Alan Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately heartbeat (for fairly broken reasons IMHO) really
needs those files there.
Could we symlink 'em somewhere?
Yes, I think that is a good solution (short of rearanging the
resource paths completely). I can do this
On 2006-06-08T08:47:41, Alan Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There may be files in there which aren't owned by our package though, or
modified.
Huh?
I just meant make individual symlinks for a individual binaries. NOT a
symlink for the entire directory.
Ahhh. Ok. I thought you wanted
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 11:01:25PM -0600, Alan Robertson wrote:
Horms wrote:
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 03:24:48PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Package: heartbeat
Severity: serious
Heya,
Let's see what the FHS says:
No binaries should be located under /etc. [3.4]
Now, what does
Horms wrote:
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 03:24:48PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Package: heartbeat
Severity: serious
Heya,
Let's see what the FHS says:
No binaries should be located under /etc. [3.4]
Now, what does heartbeat do?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/he$ dpkg-deb -x
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 03:24:48PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Package: heartbeat
Severity: serious
Heya,
Let's see what the FHS says:
No binaries should be located under /etc. [3.4]
Now, what does heartbeat do?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/he$ dpkg-deb -x
This one time, at band camp, Horms said:
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 03:24:48PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Let's see what the FHS says:
No binaries should be located under /etc. [3.4]
Now, what does heartbeat do?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/he$ dpkg-deb -x heartbeat_1.2.4-8_i386.deb
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 05:32:31PM +0900, Horms wrote:
Unfortunately heartbeat (for fairly broken reasons IMHO) really
needs those files there.
Any chances to use symlink ?
--
Julien Danjou
.''`. Debian Developer
: :' : http://julien.danjou.info
`. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid
`-
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 10:46:02AM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Horms said:
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 03:24:48PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Let's see what the FHS says:
No binaries should be located under /etc. [3.4]
Now, what does heartbeat do?
This one time, at band camp, Horms said:
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 10:46:02AM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Horms said:
Unfortunately heartbeat (for fairly broken reasons IMHO) really
needs those files there.
Can't it be a symlink?
I didn't realise that
Package: heartbeat
Severity: serious
Heya,
Let's see what the FHS says:
No binaries should be located under /etc. [3.4]
Now, what does heartbeat do?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/he$ dpkg-deb -x heartbeat_1.2.4-8_i386.deb bar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/he$ file bar/etc/ha.d/resource.d/IPv6addr
14 matches
Mail list logo
