Hi,
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:57:42 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Julien Danjou) said as follows:
Did you see the mails from Jérôme Pouiller ?
Sorry, I missed it. I have just asked my sponsor to upload a new
package including it.
Thank you very much for your kind help to fix this problem.
--
Hi,
On Thu, 3 Aug 2006 10:57:42 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Julien Danjou) said as follows:
Do you mean change of optimization option resolves this problem?
Just adding the -g yes.
If you so, I doubt that this problem is caused by the bug of
building toolchains. Can you check versions of
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 09:27:31PM +0900, TSUCHIYA Masatoshi wrote:
I heared that toolchanins for Etch are freezed. So, could you try
rebuild of Juman package using freezed versions of toolchains?
Did you see the mails from Jérôme Pouiller ?
He found the bug and sent you a patch.
If not see:
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 08:21:23AM +0900, TSUCHIYA Masatoshi wrote:
Do you mean change of optimization option resolves this problem?
Just adding the -g yes.
If you so, I doubt that this problem is caused by the bug of building
toolchains. Can you check versions of your using toolchanins?
It'd seems real problem come from '-O2' option
$ apt-get source juman cd juman-5.1 fakeroot ./debian/rules
pre-build cd build-tree/juman-5.1 env CFLAGS='-O2' ./configure
make
do segfault but
$ apt-get source juman cd juman-5.1 fakeroot ./debian/rules
pre-build cd
Le jeudi 3 août 2006 11:33, Jérôme Pouiller a écrit :
I tried to execute valgrind on makepat (compiled without '-O2'), but,
it found no errors.
In fact, I didn't run correctly valgrind, there is only one error with
CFLAGS=-g:
==32258== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 09:43:55AM +0900, TSUCHIYA Masatoshi wrote:
Yes, I cannot reproduce this problem.
I still can.
Please tell me what architecture is used when this problem occurs.
i386
And, can you record backtrace of this problem? I imagine that the
following three commands will be
Hi,
First of all, what version of distribution do you use? Sarge or Sid?
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006 10:26:43 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Julien Danjou) said as follows:
Please tell me what architecture is used when this problem occurs.
i386
You mean pure i386? or i386 family like pentium?
And more,
Hi,
Thanks for your kind help. Your help makes myself understand what
occurs in your environment, but, still I cannot understand why your
problem occurs.
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006 12:28:03 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Julien Danjou) said as follows:
(gdb) bt
#0 0xb7e5cfe6 in fileno_unlocked () from
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 06:00:51PM +0900, TSUCHIYA Masatoshi wrote:
You mean pure i386? or i386 family like pentium?
And more, what version of building tools including gcc and binutils?
No, I mean arch is i386. Real processor is Celeron (Pentium 4).
Woops. You should add -g build option to
On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 19:50:04 +0900
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (TSUCHIYA Masatoshi) said as follows:
And, please check the value of inkey variable when your problem
occurs?
I am sorry that I have just missed your first report include the above
information. It says
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 08:06:12PM +0900, TSUCHIYA Masatoshi wrote:
On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 19:50:04 +0900
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (TSUCHIYA Masatoshi) said as follows:
And, please check the value of inkey variable when your problem
occurs?
I am sorry that I have just missed your first report
Hi,
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006 13:47:56 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Julien Danjou) said as follows:
Unfortunately the problem does not occur anymore with CFLAGS=-g...
Do you mean change of optimization option resolves this problem?
If you so, I doubt that this problem is caused by the bug of building
Hi,
Thank you for your kind report.
On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 08:38:03 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Julien Danjou) said as follows:
Automatic build of juman_5.1-1 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.48
Build started at 20060715-0339
Package: juman
Version: 5.1-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
Automatic build of juman_5.1-1 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.48
Build started at 20060715-0339
**
...
15 matches
Mail list logo
