On 27/07/06, Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [there is some personal interest, sisu (sisu-pdf) has come to depend on
> the presence of manyfoot.sty, and though there will be little problem
> working with texlive, there seems no good reason why the choice of
> e
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [there is some personal interest, sisu (sisu-pdf) has come to depend on
> the presence of manyfoot.sty, and though there will be little problem
> working with texlive, there seems no good reason why the choice of
> either tetex or texlive should be precluded for this rea
tags 380034 wontfix
thanks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Package: tetex-base
> Version: 3.0-20
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Request for the inclusion of manyfoot.sty in tetex-extra.
>
> A number of scholarly writings need multiple footnote streams.
manyfoot and, as soon as it is released on CTAN, bigfo
Package: tetex-base
Version: 3.0-20
Severity: wishlist
Request for the inclusion of manyfoot.sty in tetex-extra.
A number of scholarly writings need multiple footnote streams.
manyfoot.sty is a known and documented latex package: documented in The
LaTeX Companion 2nd ed. pages 122-125. (it is c
4 matches
Mail list logo