Quoting Adam Kropelin akrop...@rochester.rr.com:
I don't think it is appropriate to configure hibernate via apcupsd.conf.
I think the proper way to implement this it is irrelevant to the end-user.
Facts are that
a) there is user request for this feature (+1 vote from me)
b) the bug reporter has
note that i am talking about adding an optional action and not
changing the default action, which is quite different than the bug
title.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
I don't think it is appropriate to configure hibernate via apcupsd.conf.
There are dozens of different things users might want to do in response
to various events and this is why the event handling in Apcupsd is
entirely scriptable. If we were to try to anticipate every user's needs
in
Package: apcupsd
Version: 3.12.3-1
I think that can be useful add support for hibernate.
For example in my workstation i have software suspend 2 and hibernate
configured, so i've made an ugly hack to /etc/apcupsd/apccontrol :
--- apccontrol_ORIG 2006-08-03 14:04:19.0 +0200
+++
4 matches
Mail list logo
