Bug#384565: [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug#384565: monotone - FTBFS: Build killed with signal 15

2006-11-22 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, Shaun Jackman wrote: It appears the BOOST_SP_DISABLE_THREADS is the source of monotone's cross-platform issues on Debian. Namely, that monotone fails to run (deadlock) on s390, hppa, sparc, mips, and mipsel, but runs fine on i386, amd64, ia64, alpha and powerpc [1].

Bug#384565: [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug#384565: monotone - FTBFS: Build killed with signal 15

2006-11-22 Thread Shaun Jackman
On 11/22/06, Roman Zippel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... 1. Is this more likely a bug in Boost or a bug in monotone? 2. Is it reasonable to workaround this bug by removing -DBOOST_SP_DISABLE_THREADS? 3. Is it worth going to the extra effort to only define -DBOOST_SP_DISABLE_THREADS on the

Bug#384565: [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug#384565: monotone - FTBFS: Build killed with signal 15

2006-11-22 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 09:54:42AM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote: On 11/22/06, Roman Zippel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... 1. Is this more likely a bug in Boost or a bug in monotone? 2. Is it reasonable to workaround this bug by removing -DBOOST_SP_DISABLE_THREADS? 3. Is it worth going to the

Bug#384565: [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug#384565: monotone - FTBFS: Build killed with signal 15

2006-11-21 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 02:04:07PM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote: It appears the BOOST_SP_DISABLE_THREADS is the source of monotone's cross-platform issues on Debian. Namely, that monotone fails to run (deadlock) on s390, hppa, sparc, mips, and mipsel, but runs fine on i386, amd64, ia64, alpha

Bug#384565: [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug#384565: monotone - FTBFS: Build killed with signal 15

2006-09-28 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, I debugged the problem a bit and the problem seems to be the BOOST_SP_DISABLE_THREADS define and monotone being linked against the multithreaded boost libraries. boost and monotone have a different idea of the sp_counted_base class, so that it gets initialized within monotone non-threaded

Bug#384565: [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug#384565: monotone - FTBFS: Build killed with signal 15

2006-09-28 Thread Shaun Jackman
Thank you for that trouble shooting! This is very useful information. Cheers, Shaun On 9/28/06, Roman Zippel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I debugged the problem a bit and the problem seems to be the BOOST_SP_DISABLE_THREADS define and monotone being linked against the multithreaded boost

Bug#384565: [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug#384565: monotone - FTBFS: Build killed with signal 15

2006-09-26 Thread Thomas Moschny
On Tuesday 26 September 2006 20:10, Shaun Jackman wrote: Both commands exist in fact. get_revision is used to generate package_full_revision.txt, and get_base_revision_id is used to generate package_revision.txt. Both of these commands require a monotone workspace though, and the tarball does