Kapil Hari Paranjape schrieb:
Since I do not use OO, I am not sure whether this issue has been
resolved. Could you please provide some information on the current
state?
OOo 2.2.1-7 has not fixed this bug. According to the OOo issue tracker
it's not fixed up to now.
BTW: it's Issue 69088
tags 384958 + upstream
tags 384958 - moreinfo
retitle 384958 openoffice.org: incorrect import of mathml into oomath
reassign 384958 openoffice.org
thanks
Hello,
Based on this response from the upstream author of tex4ht:
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007, Eitan Gurari wrote:
The tex4ht utility produces
tags 384958 + moreinfo
thanks
Hello,
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006, Tobias Schlemmer wrote:
mk4ht oolatex test.tex seems to produce incorrect output.
At least my oowriter (2.0.3) does not like the double indices $x_{i_j}$
without further grouping.
In oomath input syntax it produces x_i_j, which
mk4ht oolatex test.tex seems to produce incorrect output.
At least my oowriter (2.0.3) does not like the double indices $x_{i_j}$
without further grouping.
In oomath input syntax it produces x_i_j, which should be x_{i_j}.
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, Eitan Gurari wrote:
I'm not
Eitan Gurari wrote:
The problem is with a broken mathml engine in OpenOffice 2.
A manual editing of x_i_j into {x}_{{i}_{j}} or x_{i_j} provides the
proper display (and identical mathml code). I don't know what kind of
mathml code tex4ht should produce to obtain correct display in OO2.
As a workaround use the math:annotation tag with StarMath5 syntax as
OO does.
Deleting this tag looks right at the first glance as OOo saves a binary
copy of it inside the document. But when you try to edit the formula it
gets confused again.
Might be a good idea for simple
Package: tex4ht
Version: 20060619-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
mk4ht oolatex test.tex seems to produce incorrect output.
At least my oowriter (2.0.3) does not like the double indices $x_{i_j}$ without
further grouping.
In oomath input syntax it produces x_i_j, which should be x_{i_j}.
A similar
Hello,
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006, Tobias Schlemmer wrote:
Package: tex4ht
Version: 20060619-1
Severity: normal
mk4ht oolatex test.tex seems to produce incorrect output.
At least my oowriter (2.0.3) does not like the double indices $x_{i_j}$
without further grouping.
In oomath input syntax it
Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
So authors should prefer
$x_{a_{b}}$ while preparing a document to be processed by TeX4ht
regardless of how simple a and b are.
Which documentation?
The problem is not b, but the grouping around a_b is lost. TeX needs
that grouping, which is not translated into
The problem is with a broken mathml engine in OpenOffice 2.
eqnarray
The \begin{eqnarray}a=b\end{eqnarray} is translated by tex4ht into
mia/mimo=/momib/mi
and is loaded as
matrix {a # = # b}
by OO2 into a broken display. The xtpipe phase `fixes' the problem by
producing
10 matches
Mail list logo
