Bug#385144: [Pkg-zope-developers] Bug#385144: zope-zms: New upstream version available for some time
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, Uwe Steinmann wrote: I built a new debian package from zms 2.9.2, which was quite simple, This sounds like a reasonable contribution. Any URL? Did you make use of zope-debhelper or just recompiling the new tarball with the stuff inside the debian directory? BTW, I would be more than happy if somebody would take over zope-zms because I do not use it any more. but I'm simply too unfamiliar with zope and its intances to make it work on zope3. Would be great if you could create a new package for zope3. I think this question was just answered. The first step would be to ask upstream to port ZMS to Zope 3. BTW, what new features do you expect from ZMS if you install it into Zope 3? I wouldn't mind to help where I can. Great and thanks Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#385144: [Pkg-zope-developers] Bug#385144: zope-zms: New upstream version available for some time
Il giorno mer, 30/08/2006 alle 08.51 +0200, Uwe Steinmann ha scritto: BTW, I would be more than happy if somebody would take over zope-zms because I do not use it any more. I thought so, but I cannot honestly offer to take it over, because my knowledge of zope is rather weak. Let me try to get a recent version of zms packaged. If I do not run into major problems I'll rethink it. Hi Uwe, I can offer all the help you need with zope packaging both via email and via IRC. I really care about zope packages in Debian, but I do not use zms so I can't adopt it. If you use it and you have enough time to package new upstream releases and to care of bug reports, I would be glad if you could help us to improve the packaging. Thanks, -- Fabio Tranchitella http://www.kobold.it Free Software Developer and Consultant http://www.tranchitella.it _ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 signature.asc Description: Questa รจ una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
Bug#385144: [Pkg-zope-developers] Bug#385144: zope-zms: New upstream version available for some time
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 08:30:12AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, Uwe Steinmann wrote: I built a new debian package from zms 2.9.2, which was quite simple, This sounds like a reasonable contribution. Any URL? Did you make use of zope-debhelper or just recompiling the new tarball with the stuff inside the debian directory? I just used the existing debian directory. zope-debhelper maybe the next step. BTW, I would be more than happy if somebody would take over zope-zms because I do not use it any more. I thought so, but I cannot honestly offer to take it over, because my knowledge of zope is rather weak. Let me try to get a recent version of zms packaged. If I do not run into major problems I'll rethink it. but I'm simply too unfamiliar with zope and its intances to make it work on zope3. Would be great if you could create a new package for zope3. I think this question was just answered. The first step would be to ask upstream to port ZMS to Zope 3. BTW, what new features do you expect from ZMS if you install it into Zope 3? Nothing particular. I just thought that doing it for zope3 in the first place may be better than creating packages for *old* zope2. I wasn't aware of how different zope2 and zope3 are. I'll stick with zope2 since its far from being abandoned. I'll try to create a package for zope2, if you don't mind. Uwe -- MMK GmbH, Fleyer Str. 196, 58097 Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: +2331 840446Fax: +2331 843920 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#385144: [Pkg-zope-developers] Bug#385144: zope-zms: New upstream version available for some time
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006, Uwe Steinmann wrote: This sounds like a reasonable contribution. Any URL? Did you make use of zope-debhelper or just recompiling the new tarball with the stuff inside the debian directory? I just used the existing debian directory. zope-debhelper maybe the next step. I would not really upload a zope-zms package without switching to zope-debhelper. The old packaging method will lead into trouble with different Zope 2.x versions and should definitely be avoided. I thought so, but I cannot honestly offer to take it over, because my knowledge of zope is rather weak. Let me try to get a recent version of zms packaged. If I do not run into major problems I'll rethink it. OK. Just tell me if there is something to look at or in case of trouble. You should probably send your information to Debian Zope team [EMAIL PROTECTED] where I subscribed and also people with much more Zope experience lurking around. I'll try to create a package for zope2, if you don't mind. I would be more than happy if you would proceed. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#385144: [Pkg-zope-developers] Bug#385144: zope-zms: New upstream version available for some time
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, Uwe Steinmann wrote: Upstream is already at version 2.9. Is there any reason to keep zms at 2.3.2? The reason is quite simple: Real live issues kept me away from those packages I regarded not that important. Your request shows that it has some importance and I hope to get a new package out in about two weeks. It was on my agenda anyway. Sorry for the lazyness Andreas. PS: Because I stopped using ZMS personally it might be reasonable to bother me from time to time with new upstream versions because I stopped tracking upstream versions actively. The alternative for me would be to orphan the package completely. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#385144: [Pkg-zope-developers] Bug#385144: zope-zms: New upstream version available for some time
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 02:48:56PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, Uwe Steinmann wrote: Upstream is already at version 2.9. Is there any reason to keep zms at 2.3.2? The reason is quite simple: Real live issues kept me away from those packages I regarded not that important. Your request shows that it has some importance and I hope to get a new package out in about two weeks. It was on my agenda anyway. Sorry for the lazyness Andreas. PS: Because I stopped using ZMS personally it might be reasonable to bother me from time to time with new upstream versions because I stopped tracking upstream versions actively. The alternative for me would be to orphan the package completely. I built a new debian package from zms 2.9.2, which was quite simple, but I'm simply too unfamiliar with zope and its intances to make it work on zope3. Would be great if you could create a new package for zope3. I wouldn't mind to help where I can. Uwe -- MMK GmbH, Fleyer Str. 196, 58097 Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: +2331 840446Fax: +2331 843920 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#385144: [Pkg-zope-developers] Bug#385144: zope-zms: New upstream version available for some time
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 04:32:06PM +0200, Uwe Steinmann wrote: I built a new debian package from zms 2.9.2, which was quite simple, but I'm simply too unfamiliar with zope and its intances to make it work on zope3. Would be great if you could create a new package for zope3. zope3 is a complete re-write of Zope 2 with totally different architecture and concepts. So, right now, it is almost impossible to write a non-trivial extension that works on both. -- Brian Sutherland Metropolis - it's the first movie with a robot. And she's a woman. And she's EVIL!! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#385144: [Pkg-zope-developers] Bug#385144: zope-zms: New upstream version available for some time
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 05:38:30PM +0200, Brian Sutherland wrote: On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 04:32:06PM +0200, Uwe Steinmann wrote: I built a new debian package from zms 2.9.2, which was quite simple, but I'm simply too unfamiliar with zope and its intances to make it work on zope3. Would be great if you could create a new package for zope3. zope3 is a complete re-write of Zope 2 with totally different architecture and concepts. So, right now, it is almost impossible to write a non-trivial extension that works on both. Is there any documentation or a best practise example on how to package a product like zms for zope3? Uwe -- MMK GmbH, Fleyer Str. 196, 58097 Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: +2331 840446Fax: +2331 843920 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#385144: [Pkg-zope-developers] Bug#385144: zope-zms: New upstream version available for some time
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 05:58:03PM +0200, Uwe Steinmann wrote: On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 05:38:30PM +0200, Brian Sutherland wrote: On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 04:32:06PM +0200, Uwe Steinmann wrote: I built a new debian package from zms 2.9.2, which was quite simple, but I'm simply too unfamiliar with zope and its intances to make it work on zope3. Would be great if you could create a new package for zope3. zope3 is a complete re-write of Zope 2 with totally different architecture and concepts. So, right now, it is almost impossible to write a non-trivial extension that works on both. Is there any documentation or a best practise example on how to package a product like zms for zope3? It's not really a matter of packaging. More that you would probably have to re-write most of zms to make it work with zope3. Which I guess would take a _long_ time. However, Zope 2 is slowly starting to be based on Zope 3 (a process of years). So, perhaps by Zope 2.15 porting zms to pure Zope3 will probably be easier. However, if you want to, probably the best first step would be to learn to write Zope 3 extensions. Googling for 'zope 3 10 minutes' gives some reasonable places to start with links to further docs. Uwe -- MMK GmbH, Fleyer Str. 196, 58097 Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: +2331 840446Fax: +2331 843920 -- Brian Sutherland Metropolis - it's the first movie with a robot. And she's a woman. And she's EVIL!! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
