On Fri, 08 Sep 2006, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Henrique de Moraes Holschuh]
Also, may I humbly suggest naming the new package sysvinit-utils instead of
sysvutils?
Personally I prefer the sysv prefix, to match sysv-rc. Part of my
rationale is that the killall5, last, lastb, mesg and
On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 09:46 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
As a sidenote, I'd really appreciate if the Ubuntu guys would consider
adopting this instance (don't take this as you're doing a bad job, because
you are not. Please take it as please go through a bit more pain to make
On Fri, 08 Sep 2006, Scott James Remnant wrote:
We'll adopt whatever name Debian ultimately decide.
Thanks, although that was not the main point of my request :-)
--
One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of
On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 12:44 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Fri, 08 Sep 2006, Scott James Remnant wrote:
We'll adopt whatever name Debian ultimately decide.
Thanks, although that was not the main point of my request :-)
Umm, then I missed it? :P What was the main point?
also sprach Scott James Remnant [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.09.08.1754 +0200]:
Thanks, although that was not the main point of my request :-)
Umm, then I missed it? :P What was the main point?
(I only bounced that last message of yours to Scott, Henrique)
--
.''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL
On Fri, 08 Sep 2006, Scott James Remnant wrote:
On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 12:44 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Fri, 08 Sep 2006, Scott James Remnant wrote:
We'll adopt whatever name Debian ultimately decide.
Thanks, although that was not the main point of my request :-)
On Wed, 06 Sep 2006, martin f krafft wrote:
Also, may I humbly suggest naming the new package sysvinit-utils
instead of sysvutils?
Well, except that this would be a divergance from Ubuntu, but on the
other hand, there's no reason why the Ubuntu package cannot depend
on
also sprach Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.09.06.1548
+0200]:
If I may be so humble, we don't have to follow Ubuntu 100%.
Of course not. But any diff I don't have to keep track of is less
work for me.
The same way that the Debian team is happy to work to bring
On Tue, 05 Sep 2006, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
I did some more testing, trying to upgrade the package using 'dpkg
-i', and ran into serious problems. It refuses to upgrade because
sysvinit pre-depend on sysvutils, which include a file already in the
old/existing sysvinit. I suspect the
also sprach Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.09.06.0619
+0200]:
A Replaces: sysvinit (= [whatever]) header in the sysvutils package should
fix this.
He had
Replaces: last, sysvinit ( 2.86.ds1-15)
in there... I am not sure about the use of the version though...
Also, may
10 matches
Mail list logo
