Bug#388363: reasons to keep it?

2007-04-03 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Holger Levsen wrote: from the package descriptions, feta and wajig seem to have the same features. Joe Wreschnig, the orphaning maintainer of feta is also it's upstream, so I wonder what reasons there are to keep feta in the archive? Wouldn't removing it and adding a conflicts: provides:

Bug#388363: reasons to keep it?

2006-11-26 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, from the package descriptions, feta and wajig seem to have the same features. Joe Wreschnig, the orphaning maintainer of feta is also it's upstream, so I wonder what reasons there are to keep feta in the archive? Wouldn't removing it and adding a conflicts: provides: feta (or replaces?