From: Julien BLACHE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#388929: mcelog: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 09:09:29 +0200
Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One or more template(s) has/have been identified in mcelog
debconf
Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Could you give more details about this so that further checks can
easily avoid pointing again to mcelog? Details would help Thomas
Huriaux to improve his scripts.
I'm using the note to warn the admin when mcelog is not usable on the
machine. I
Quoting Julien BLACHE ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Could you give more details about this so that further checks can
easily avoid pointing again to mcelog? Details would help Thomas
Huriaux to improve his scripts.
I'm using the note to warn the
reopen 388929
retitle 388929 mcelog: Debconf note -- Please use the error type
thanks
Hi,
Julien BLACHE [EMAIL PROTECTED] (23/09/2006):
Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you give more details about this so that further checks can
easily avoid pointing again to mcelog? Details
Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seems to be a good use case for the error template type, indeed, as
I try to explain in the bug report..:-)
Well I'll have a look, then.
Also check whether the note is indeed *really* mailed. IIRC, JOeyh
Hess mentioend in the small thread we had on
5 matches
Mail list logo
