On Die, 04 Sep 2007, Norbert Preining wrote:
A provide could be handy, but replace is useless, because no files are
replaced. But I don't have the policy at hand ...
apt-cache rdepend latex-svninfo
does not show anything, so not even provide should be necessary.
Anyone agrees?
Best wishes
On Wednesday 05 September 2007 16.30:10 Norbert Preining wrote:
On Die, 04 Sep 2007, Norbert Preining wrote:
A provide could be handy, but replace is useless, because no files are
replaced. But I don't have the policy at hand ...
apt-cache rdepend latex-svninfo
does not show anything, so
Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Die, 04 Sep 2007, Frank Küster wrote:
Conflict is already there, replace is not necessary since the files are
installed into different trees (texmf-texlive and texmf).
Closing this bug.
Not sure that this is correct. If we want to take it
On Die, 04 Sep 2007, Frank Küster wrote:
Conflict is already there, replace is not necessary since the files are
installed into different trees (texmf-texlive and texmf).
Closing this bug.
Not sure that this is correct. If we want to take it over, and make
sure that users of
On Thursday 03 May 2007 19.14:56 Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
Hi,
svninfo.sty is now provided by package texlive-latex-extra
as /usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/svninfo/svninfo.sty.
I see 2 possible outcomes:
- ask FTP admins to remove this package
Since tetex is now officially dead letting
Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seriously, a dummy package for a package that provided one single file only
anyway is a bit silly... Can't texlive-latex-extra conflict/replace
latex-svninfo?
Yes, we should do that. Of course you're free to keep maintaining it,
and we would
retitle 390032 Please conflict replace latex-svninfo
assign 390032 texlive-latex-extra
thanks
On Friday 04 May 2007 18:05, you wrote:
Adrian von Bidder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seriously, a dummy package for a package that provided one single file
only anyway is a bit silly... Can't
Hi,
svninfo.sty is now provided by package texlive-latex-extra
as /usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/svninfo/svninfo.sty.
I see 2 possible outcomes:
- ask FTP admins to remove this package
- transform this package into a dummy package that depends on
texlive-latex-extra.
--
Laurent
Hi Adrian, hi Frank!
On Mon, 02 Okt 2006, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
NMU(s) very welcome, EBUSY for at least two/three weeks ($WORK during the
week, and away next weekends, too.)
I have prepared a NMU 0.4-1.1 which should fix the two bugs about
texlive and about moving the config file.
Till
Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 02 Okt 2006, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
I'm not actively using latex-svninfo atm, I mainly packaged it because I
used it one time and happen to know Achim (upstream) a bit. So if you're
so inclined you may as well consider it in RFA-like
Hi Norbert, Frank
On Friday 29 September 2006 00:02, Norbert Preining wrote:
Could you please upload a package which depends on
tetex-bin | some-texlive-package
I checked the svninfo.sty and there are the following packages
mentioned:
fancyheadings
not in TeX live
Package: latex-svninfo
Version: 0.4-1
Severity: wishlist
Hi Adrian!
Could you please upload a package which depends on
tetex-bin | some-texlive-package
I checked the svninfo.sty and there are the following packages
mentioned:
fancyheadings
not in TeX live
12 matches
Mail list logo
