So.. is there anything to do about this?
-- Pasi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 02:18:01PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 12:54:31PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
What about idea not to *add* pae versions of xen kernels, but to *replace*
non-pae versions with pae versions?
Rationale:
- not increase in
What about idea not to *add* pae versions of xen kernels, but to *replace*
non-pae versions with pae versions?
Rationale:
- not increase in archive size or linux-2.6 package build time,
- this will improve compatimility with other distros (consider scenario
when running FC or RHEL in domU;
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 12:54:31PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
What about idea not to *add* pae versions of xen kernels, but to *replace*
non-pae versions with pae versions?
Rationale:
- not increase in archive size or linux-2.6 package build time,
- this will improve
severity 390862 wishlist
thanks
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 03:08:15PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
Currently, debian does not provide any xen kernel with pae enabled.
And?
So I'm raising severity of this bug.
Not appropriate, the maintainer decides this for such bugs.
Bastian
--
Mind
severity 390862 wishlist
thanks
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 03:08:15PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
Currently, debian does not provide any xen kernel with pae enabled.
And?
I've written why it's bad. By this decision, you are breaking important
usage scenario, effectively making
great :-)
so i can hope i've not to build my own xen-pae kernels when etch will be
stable.
--
greetings
eMHa
pgpFTBjuSC94N.pgp
Description: PGP signature
severity 390862 important
thanks
Hello.
Currently, debian does not provide any xen kernel with pae enabled.
This forces to use xen hypervisor without pae support, which in turn makes
it impossible to use more than 3.5G of system RAM.
But the very idea of virtualization is to provide better
8 matches
Mail list logo
