On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 23:25:46 -0500
Anthony DeRobertis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Palfrader wrote:
How come it never outputs p4_clockmod? I use that happily on several
different machines.
I can confirm I've tried it on a machine. The performance impact was
substantial (at least
Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
Peter Palfrader wrote:
How come it never outputs p4_clockmod? I use that happily on several
different machines.
I can confirm I've tried it on a machine. The performance impact was
substantial (at least if I allowed it to go to its lowest speed); the
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
Peter Palfrader wrote:
How come it never outputs p4_clockmod? I use that happily on several
different machines.
I can confirm I've tried it on a machine. The performance impact was
substantial (at least if I allowed it to go to its
Peter Palfrader:
How come it never outputs p4_clockmod? I use that happily on several
different machines.
It's disabled in Ubuntu with the following comment:
# Disabled for now - the latency tends to be bad enough to make it
# fairly pointless.
# echo FREQDRIVER=p4-clockmod
Peter Palfrader wrote:
How come it never outputs p4_clockmod? I use that happily on several
different machines.
I can confirm I've tried it on a machine. The performance impact was
substantial (at least if I allowed it to go to its lowest speed); the
power consumption difference was
On Oct 30, Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do you want to make a separate package for such a tiny shell script?
The overhead is just two much.
I'd propose to include it into the powermgmt-base package.
I fully agree, it's silly to create a package for a 2 KB shell script.
--
ciao,
Hi,
Marco d'Itri:
On Oct 30, Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do you want to make a separate package for such a tiny shell script?
The overhead is just two much.
I'd propose to include it into the powermgmt-base package.
I fully agree, it's silly to create a package for a 2 KB
Per Olofsson wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Per Olofsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: cpufreq-detect
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Per Olofsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: shell
Description : detect CPU
Michael Biebl:
one more comment:
The shell script contains a bashism (==) at line 95, which is not
posix compliant. Use a simple = instead.
Thanks. There were many bashisms in the original script from Ubuntu,
and I apparently missed this one.
--
Pelle
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Per Olofsson wrote:
Hi,
Marco d'Itri:
On Oct 30, Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do you want to make a separate package for such a tiny shell script?
The overhead is just two much.
I'd propose to include it into the powermgmt-base package.
I fully agree, it's silly to create a
Chris Hanson:
Probably yes, but I'd like to see it before I decide.
Attached. I will probably change a few things though, it should
probably by default try to load the module instead of merely
outputting it.
Does this have to make it into etch?
Nope. Although it would be nice, of course.
--
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Per Olofsson wrote:
Chris Hanson:
Probably yes, but I'd like to see it before I decide.
Attached. I will probably change a few things though, it should
probably by default try to load the module instead of merely
outputting it.
How come it never outputs p4_clockmod?
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Per Olofsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: cpufreq-detect
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Per Olofsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: shell
Description : detect CPU frequency control driver
This
13 matches
Mail list logo
