Bug#397922: kmail: undocumented functionality change in reply to.

2009-04-19 Thread Sune Vuorela
Hi We are not going to document upgrade issues from 3.5.4 to 3.5.5 any more. Sorry for the inconvenience and for the processing time /Sune -- I cannot click the bus, how does it work? The point is that from Office XP and from Linux and from the panel menu inside iMac you must install on a

Bug#397922: kmail: undocumented functionality change in reply to.

2006-11-11 Thread Christian Frommeyer
Am Freitag 10 November 2006 21:02 schrieb Kevin Krammer: The reply-to is not set. I did a bit of experimentation and it seems that 'r' replies to the list if reply-to is absent, but uses reply-to if present which would be even more confusing... Would be interesting to have an earlier version

Bug#397922: kmail: undocumented functionality change in reply to.

2006-11-10 Thread Christian Frommeyer
Package: kmail Version: 4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-1 Severity: normal Hi there, I was just very surprised to see a reply I intedndet to sent to the author of the mail I replyed to apear on the whole list. I am pretty sure that kmail 3.5.4 behaved diffrent. In details: in earlier versions of kmail hitting

Bug#397922: kmail: undocumented functionality change in reply to.

2006-11-10 Thread Kevin Krammer
On Friday 10 November 2006 14:23, Christian Frommeyer wrote: Package: kmail Version: 4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-1 Severity: normal Hi there, I was just very surprised to see a reply I intedndet to sent to the author of the mail I replyed to apear on the whole list. I am pretty sure that kmail 3.5.4

Bug#397922: kmail: undocumented functionality change in reply to.

2006-11-10 Thread Christian Frommeyer
Am Freitag 10 November 2006 19:54 schrieb Kevin Krammer: I just tested this with the mail your report generated on the debian-qt-kde mailinglist. Pressing'r' creates this very mail, i.e. two addresses (you and the bugreport). Well I can't comment this as I don't have the headers. Pressing

Bug#397922: kmail: undocumented functionality change in reply to.

2006-11-10 Thread Kevin Krammer
On Friday 10 November 2006 20:16, Christian Frommeyer wrote: Am Freitag 10 November 2006 19:54 schrieb Kevin Krammer: Which mailinglist did you test it with, maybe it sets itself as the reply-to address? I first realised the problem on a private list but its the same with e.g.