Bug#401903: should not ship /etc/apache2/sites-available/tetex-doc

2006-12-07 Thread Frank Küster
Uwe Kleine-Koenig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Moreover both URL that are mentioned in that file don't work for me: wget -q -O - http://localhost/doc/tetex-doc/texdoc.php gets the php-script uninterpreted. Probably the file should be guarded by IfModule php or something like that?

Bug#401903: should not ship /etc/apache2/sites-available/tetex-doc

2006-12-07 Thread Ralf Stubner
Frank Küster wrote: Uwe Kleine-Koenig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Moreover both URL that are mentioned in that file don't work for me: wget -q -O - http://localhost/doc/tetex-doc/texdoc.php gets the php-script uninterpreted. Probably the file should be guarded by IfModule php or

Bug#401903: should not ship /etc/apache2/sites-available/tetex-doc

2006-12-07 Thread Uwe Kleine-Koenig
Hi Frank, Frank Küster wrote: Uwe Kleine-Koenig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Moreover both URL that are mentioned in that file don't work for me: wget -q -O - http://localhost/doc/tetex-doc/texdoc.php gets the php-script uninterpreted. Probably the file should be guarded by

Bug#401903: should not ship /etc/apache2/sites-available/tetex-doc

2006-12-07 Thread Frank Küster
Uwe Kleine-Koenig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: These packages (actually those for apache2) are only Suggested. Should we move this to Recommends? I wouldn't do that. In my eyes Suggested is fine. I think so, too: Many who want tetex-doc will not want an apache running. There are still a few

Bug#401903: should not ship /etc/apache2/sites-available/tetex-doc

2006-12-06 Thread Uwe Kleine-Koenig
Package: tetex-doc Version: 3.0.dfsg.3-1 Severity: minor File: /etc/apache2/sites-available/tetex-doc Hello, /etc/apache2/sites-available/tetex-doc doesn't define a new host, but only adds some configuration concerning one directory (namely /usr/share/texmf-tetex). In my eyes this configuration

Bug#401903: should not ship /etc/apache2/sites-available/tetex-doc

2006-12-06 Thread Frank Küster
Hi, Uwe Kleine-Koenig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hast du geheiratet, oder verwendest du den Account vom anderen Uwe? Im ersten Fall herzlichen Glückwunsch (obwohl ich König Zeisberg noch besser gefunden hätte ;-)). /etc/apache2/sites-available/tetex-doc doesn't define a new host, but only adds

Bug#401903: should not ship /etc/apache2/sites-available/tetex-doc

2006-12-06 Thread Uwe Kleine-Koenig
Hallo Frank, Frank Küster wrote: Hast du geheiratet, oder verwendest du den Account vom anderen Uwe? Im ersten Fall herzlichen Glückwunsch ersteres, Danke schoen. (obwohl ich König Zeisberg noch besser gefunden hätte ;-)). Wir wollten das[1] auch, aber die Standesbeamtin war dagegen.