On Thursday 21 December 2006 02:46, Steve Langasek wrote:
> You could argue that the package is "unfit for release" (=> sev:
> serious), but then I don't see how that's consistent with asking for an
> etch-ignore tag. If it's ignorable for etch, I don't see why it
> wouldn't also be ignorable for
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 02:41:29PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 December 2006 08:35, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > I have yet to see the dataloss. Anyways, bugs being important doesn't
> > mean they are not allowed to be fixed (and I would let such an fix
> > still to Etch currently), but
* Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061220 14:42]:
> On Wednesday 20 December 2006 08:35, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > I have yet to see the dataloss. Anyways, bugs being important doesn't
> > mean they are not allowed to be fixed (and I would let such an fix
> > still to Etch currently), but I don't thin
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 08:35, Andreas Barth wrote:
> I have yet to see the dataloss. Anyways, bugs being important doesn't
> mean they are not allowed to be fixed (and I would let such an fix
> still to Etch currently), but I don't think we should wait on the fix.
> So I'm downgrading to imp
severity 402482 important
thanks
* Steve McIntyre ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061211 17:02]:
> Joey wrote:
> >I don't belive that this bug is actually RC: There's a workaround for
> >the problem in debian-cd, and the bug's not causing any other
> >problems that I know of.
>
> I'm happy for this to be ta
Joey wrote:
>I don't belive that this bug is actually RC: There's a workaround for
>the problem in debian-cd, and the bug's not causing any other
>problems that I know of.
I'm happy for this to be tagged etch-ignore, but it can potentially
lead to data loss so I think it should stay as serious in
I don't belive that this bug is actually RC: There's a workaround for
the problem in debian-cd, and the bug's not causing any other problems
that I know of.
--
see shy jo, fairly heavy user of gzip >> file.gz
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
7 matches
Mail list logo