Karsten,
Do you actually still have your SWARM?
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-26 13:37]:
> * Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-10 11:23]:
> > * Karsten Merker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-21 21:54]:
> > > > Karsten, can you check if this problem is still there with
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-10 11:23]:
> * Karsten Merker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-21 21:54]:
> > > Karsten, can you check if this problem is still there with current
> > > kernels? i.e. 2.6.23 or 2.6.24
> >
> > I'll check it, but I probably won't be able to do so before
>
* Karsten Merker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-21 21:54]:
> > Karsten, can you check if this problem is still there with current
> > kernels? i.e. 2.6.23 or 2.6.24
>
> I'll check it, but I probably won't be able to do so before
> next week.
Karsten, did you ever find time to check this?
--
Mart
Karsten, can you check if this problem is still there with current
kernels? i.e. 2.6.23 or 2.6.24
* Karsten Merker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-05 01:22]:
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 08:30:32PM +0100, Karsten Merker wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 04:48:09PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
>
> > > The
On Wednesday 24 January 2007 22:58, Frans Pop wrote:
> The issue has been worked around in partman-base (function humandev in
> definitions.sh) by adding code that recognizes .../lun0/part (without
> partition number) as a disk; leaving partman bug open as the workaround
> should be removed once th
retitle 404950 [mips] Disk is advertised as partition on SWARM (Broadcom
BCM91250a)
clone 404950 -1
reassign 404950 parman-base
reassign -1 linux-2.6 2.6.18-7
block 404950 with -1
thanks
On Friday 05 January 2007 01:22, Karsten Merker wrote:
> ~ # ls -l /dev/hda*
> lrwxrwxrwx1 root root
On Thursday 04 January 2007 16:48, Frans Pop wrote:
> The device that is passed to partman is:
> /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part
>
> The code in partman that interprets this expects either:
> /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/disc
> /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part1
>
> But in this case,
On Friday 29 December 2006 21:45, Karsten Merker wrote:
> "The following partitions are going to be formatted:
>partition #3 of IDE1 master, partition # (hda) as ext3
>partition #7 of IDE1 master, partition # (hda) as ext3
> ^
Karsten has mai
On Friday 29 December 2006 22:48, Frans Pop wrote:
> I'll try if I can reproduce this myself, but I suspect the arch may be
> a factor here. If not I'll see what debugging is needed to trace this
> (a few 'set -x' in the right place should do it) and let you know.
I think I'll need a log from you
On Friday 29 December 2006 21:45, Karsten Merker wrote:
> (see http://people.debian.org/~merker/bug-404950/snapshot14.png
> for a screenshot)
>
> What makes me wonder is the text of the messages in the next two steps:
> "The following partitions are going to be formatted:
>partition #3 of IDE1
* Karsten Merker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-12-29 21:45]:
> In the step "Detecting disks and all other hardware" another
> error gets displayed: "Error while running 'modprobe -v
> amd74xx'", but it does not cause any further problems. Dmesg
> reveals that the module loader cannot resolve a kernel s
Package: installation-reports
Severity: grave
Boot method: netboot
Image version: Etch RC1,
http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-mips/rc1/images/sb1-bcm91250a/netboot/
Date: 2006-12-29
Machine: Broadcom BCM91250a "SWARM", mips/big-endian mode,
256MB RAM, serial c
12 matches
Mail list logo
