tags 376165 - patch pending
tags 376165 wontfix
thanks
Hello,
I reverted the patch.
It is not possible to have a correct PAM sessions support in
start-stop-daemon.
When start-stop-daemon starts a daemon, it cannot closes the PAM session,
or the session will be closed before the daemon quits.
On Thursday 29 March 2007 07:56, Nicolas François
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is not possible to have a correct PAM sessions support in
start-stop-daemon.
When start-stop-daemon starts a daemon, it cannot closes the PAM session,
or the session will be closed before the daemon quits.
What is
Hi Russell,
On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 09:34:55 +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
On Thursday 29 March 2007 07:56, Nicolas François
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is not possible to have a correct PAM sessions support in
start-stop-daemon.
When start-stop-daemon starts a daemon, it cannot closes the
Hi,
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 00:07:01 +0100, Nicolas François wrote:
The attached patch adds a --pam service option to start-stop-daemon.
It only implements PAM session (i.e. no authentication, etc), which I
guess is sufficient.
Cool! But could you add an option at configure time to
block 373786 by 406942
merge 376165 406942
tags 376165 patch
thanks
Hi,
In both #376165 and #406942, you asked for PAM support in
start-stop-daemon.
The attached patch adds a --pam service option to start-stop-daemon.
It only implements PAM session (i.e. no authentication, etc), which I
guess
5 matches
Mail list logo
