Bug#409271: Status?

2016-08-04 Thread Timothy Pearson 
What is the status of this bug report?  NFSv3 is becoming obsolete, and
this bug report is over *9 years* old now!

Bug#409271: Status of this bug ?

2010-06-09 Thread Michael Prokop 
* maximilian attems m...@stro.at [Wed Jun 09, 2010 at 04:25:09AM +0200]:
 On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 03:47:59PM +0200, Michael Prokop wrote:
  * Steinar H. Gunderson sgunder...@bigfoot.com [Son Aug 10, 2008 at 
  05:03:28 +0200]:
   On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 04:35:23PM +0200, Fabrice Lorrain wrote:
I've just read through bts #409271 :initramfs-tools: NFSv4 not  
supported for root fs
and I'm interrested in knowing the status of this bug for lenny.

   AFAIK my understanding is: klibc's mount doesn't support NFSv4, initramfs
   insists on using klibc's mount, stalemate.

  maks, we should discuss this issue in further details,
  we be great if we could resolve this in time for squeeze.

 in a week i'm a back, but this is over ambitious.

Fair enoug,. though if we have a conclusion regarding
klibc-libc-busybox... solving this problem might not be that
much work. But yeah, let's discuss that when you're back.

thanks  regards,
-mika-


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#409271: Status of this bug ?

2010-06-08 Thread Michael Prokop 
* Steinar H. Gunderson sgunder...@bigfoot.com [Son Aug 10, 2008 at 05:03:28 
+0200]:
 On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 04:35:23PM +0200, Fabrice Lorrain wrote:
  I've just read through bts #409271 :initramfs-tools: NFSv4 not  
  supported for root fs
  and I'm interrested in knowing the status of this bug for lenny.

 AFAIK my understanding is: klibc's mount doesn't support NFSv4, initramfs
 insists on using klibc's mount, stalemate.

maks, we should discuss this issue in further details,
we be great if we could resolve this in time for squeeze.

regards,
-mika-


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#409271: Status of this bug ?

2010-06-08 Thread maximilian attems 
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 03:47:59PM +0200, Michael Prokop wrote:
 * Steinar H. Gunderson sgunder...@bigfoot.com [Son Aug 10, 2008 at 05:03:28 
 +0200]:
  On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 04:35:23PM +0200, Fabrice Lorrain wrote:
   I've just read through bts #409271 :initramfs-tools: NFSv4 not  
   supported for root fs
   and I'm interrested in knowing the status of this bug for lenny.
 
  AFAIK my understanding is: klibc's mount doesn't support NFSv4, initramfs
  insists on using klibc's mount, stalemate.
 
 maks, we should discuss this issue in further details,
 we be great if we could resolve this in time for squeeze.

in a week i'm a back, but this is over ambitious.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#409271: Status of this bug ?

2008-08-10 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson 
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 04:35:23PM +0200, Fabrice Lorrain wrote:
 I've just read through bts #409271 :initramfs-tools: NFSv4 not  
 supported for root fs
 and I'm interrested in knowing the status of this bug for lenny.

AFAIK my understanding is: klibc's mount doesn't support NFSv4, initramfs
insists on using klibc's mount, stalemate.

/* Steinar */
-- 
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#409271: Status of this bug ?

2008-08-10 Thread Fabrice Lorrain 

Hello,

I've just read through bts #409271 :initramfs-tools: NFSv4 not 
supported for root fs

and I'm interrested in knowing the status of this bug for lenny.

Thanks,

@+,
Fab

PS : ccing nfs-aware people.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]