tags 412069 +wontfix
thank you
Trying to summarize:
About Composite, upstream just got a commit saying
Enable Composite by default now that it disables itself in
the known bad cases.
(and it has been said that
fglrx disables the DRI when Composite is enabled.)
About XAANoOffScreenPixmap,
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 09:23:20AM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
tags 412069 +wontfix
thank you
Trying to summarize:
[...]
So I would personally not enable any of these options by
default (hence tagging as wontfix). It is already very late
in the release cycle, changing the default
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 10:41:32 +0200, Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote:
Ok. Can we add hooks to permit that unofficial beryl packages for etch add
the missing bits in xorg.conf without breaking the debconf-based generation?
See attached patch.
Not going to happen for etch, sorry.
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 06:26:45PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 11:33:12AM +0100, Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 10:55:55AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
My point is that if we don't figure that out satisfactorily in time, we
could
just
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 06:25:51PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 10:26:09AM +0100, Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 11:02:02PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
I haven't decided if enabling composite by default is a wise move yet. No
one in
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007, Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 06:26:45PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 11:33:12AM +0100, Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 10:55:55AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
My point is that if we don't figure
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 11:45 +0200, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007, Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote:
That sounds more like an upstream solution. IMHO, in Debian we should do it
in the conffile because:
- It's more transparent. User can tell this is enabled without going
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 10:39:13AM +0100, Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 06:25:51PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 10:26:09AM +0100, Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 11:02:02PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
I haven't
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 11:02:02PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
I haven't decided if enabling composite by default is a wise move yet. No
one in Debian has done a real analysis as to what the downsides of such a
decision are.
While compiz and beryl may be very sexy, I don't want to break or
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 13:12 +0100, Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 12:39:45PM +0100, Xavier Bestel wrote:
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 11:44 +0100, Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote:
My intel card can do without either XAANoOffscreenPixmaps or
AddARGBGLXVisuals.
No
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 10:55:55AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
My point is that if we don't figure that out satisfactorily in time, we
could
just enable the Composite extension, which sounds fairly safe, and seems to
be
enough for Intel cards. And Intel happens to be the card brand we
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 10:26:09AM +0100, Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 11:02:02PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
I haven't decided if enabling composite by default is a wise move yet. No
one in Debian has done a real analysis as to what the downsides of such a
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 11:33:12AM +0100, Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 10:55:55AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
My point is that if we don't figure that out satisfactorily in time, we
could
just enable the Composite extension, which sounds fairly safe, and seems
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 11:44:36AM +0100, Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 10:25:56PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
Oh, not really. Screw nVidia. Beryl is only for faithful followers of the
one true Intel card brand. :-)
So which lines are we going to add, if
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 10:25:56PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
Oh, not really. Screw nVidia. Beryl is only for faithful followers of the
one true Intel card brand. :-)
So which lines are we going to add, if any? I can test which lines can
Intel do without, but not till monday.
My
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 11:44 +0100, Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote:
My intel card can do without either XAANoOffscreenPixmaps or
AddARGBGLXVisuals.
No difference can be found on first sight (and I tested most basic stuff:
cube,
skydome, etc).
nVidia doesn't need AddARGBGLXVisuals, but it
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 12:39:45PM +0100, Xavier Bestel wrote:
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 11:44 +0100, Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote:
My intel card can do without either XAANoOffscreenPixmaps or
AddARGBGLXVisuals.
No difference can be found on first sight (and I tested most basic stuff:
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 12:18:06PM +0100, Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote:
Package: xserver-xorg
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
I know it's too late for Beryl to make it into etch, but can we at least ship
an xorg.conf that is frendly to Beryl ? With this patch, only installing
the beryl
Package: xserver-xorg
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
I know it's too late for Beryl to make it into etch, but can we at least ship
an xorg.conf that is frendly to Beryl ? With this patch, only installing
the beryl packages will be enough to get it working with no further setup
(provided that
Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote:
+ Option AddARGBGLXVisuals On
I thought this option was nVidia specific.
Brice
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 12:54:58PM +0100, Brice Goglin wrote:
Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote:
+ Option AddARGBGLXVisuals On
I thought this option was nVidia specific.
According to the wiki [1], it is optional if NVIDIA drivers are used.
On my Intel chipset, this line didn't
Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 12:54:58PM +0100, Brice Goglin wrote:
Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote:
+ Option AddARGBGLXVisuals On
I thought this option was nVidia specific.
According to the wiki [1], it is optional if NVIDIA drivers are used.
This comment is for
This comment is for XAANoOffscreenPixmaps. I could say ok to adding
this option since I remember seeing improvement in Compiz when enabling
it on my Radeon. But, I don't know what its drawbacks are.
About being nVidia specific, I was talking about the other line,
AddARGBGLXVisuals, I have
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 10:25:56PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
About being nVidia specific, I was talking about the other line,
AddARGBGLXVisuals, I have no idea what this option does.
Neither me, I just got them from the wiki.
I just tried on an nVidia, and it turns out
24 matches
Mail list logo
