On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 03:30:47PM +0100, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On 2014-01-25 14:46 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 09:19:26PM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> > >    libimdb-film-perl              [popcon:13]
> > 
> > Fine to remove this one. I adopted it some time ago into the group,
> > for pushing the libdigest-sha1-perl removal. The RC bug is open since
> > very early, to not let libimdb-film-perl, as the "imdb.com website is
> > likely to change during the lifetime of a stabel release" to cite the
> > former maintainer.
> > 
> > I personally don't use this module, and wouldn't mind if this is
> > removed.
> 
> On the other hand, the bug [1] doesn't document any actual issues seen
> today afaict, and the note about using volatile seems relevant. Also,
> upstream is active, with releases in 2013.
> 
> The situation is not unlike those faced by various video fetchers
> (e.g. libquvi-scripts, youtube-dl etc etc). Of course, it's your
> choice; I don't really know the burden of maintaining scraping modules
> and updating them via *-updates.

I'm CCing the bug so this discussion is recorded in the relevant place.
I think I would tend to agree that we should give the package the benefit
of the doubt; closing this bug and dealing with issues as they arise,
via stable-updates if needed. But then again I also don't use the module...

Dominic.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to