Bug#415954: Bug#416156: PID handling in init.d is fragile

2007-03-28 Thread José Luis Tallón
Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: Can you please bounce this mail to the bug log? I didn't want to do so because this is private mail, but this really really should be part of the bug log. On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 12:13:39AM +0200, José Luis Tallón wrote: Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: On

Bug#415954: Bug#416156: PID handling in init.d is fragile

2007-03-28 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 08:26:27AM +0200, José Luis Tallón wrote: Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: Uploaded as NMU, because I actually made some changes. Reviewed them. Gotta ACK, anyway. (You are right in the changes you made, I would have done it differently) That's of course fine, your

Bug#415954: Bug#416156: PID handling in init.d is fragile

2007-03-28 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 05:01:09PM +0200, José Luis Tallón wrote: Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: It's a misconfiguration, sure, but one that happens on default install (out of the box imapproxy is misconfigured? Well, it was in my case, but probably related to the fact that I don't actually

Bug#415954: Bug#416156: PID handling in init.d is fragile

2007-03-28 Thread José Luis Tallón
Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: [snip] Fine. I did put the function back where it was though, instead of moving it way below, because the stuff in between can hang (for example, when failing to connect, it'll indefinitely retry every 15 seconds, causing 'start' to hang). Yup. I